Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF STATE OF NEW JERSEY JUDICIARY"
Results 101 - 120
of 332
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2014, 6:47 am
Maryland, a 2003 decision involving rights to the Potomac River; New Jersey v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:51 am
This can be an important added weapon since some states, such as New Jersey, recognize an employer’s right to enjoin disclosure of confidential business information that does not itself meet the definition of a trade secret. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:51 am
This can be an important added weapon since some states, such as New Jersey, recognize an employer’s right to enjoin disclosure of confidential business information that does not itself meet the definition of a trade secret. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:09 am
Indeed, the right against self-incrimination, although not protected by the New Jersey constitution, is deeply rooted in our jurisprudence and codified in N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-19, which states that every person in New Jersey “has a right to refuse to disclose in an action…any matter that will incriminate him or expose him to penalty…” Both the United States Supreme Court and our New Jersey courts… [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:09 am
Indeed, the right against self-incrimination, although not protected by the New Jersey constitution, is deeply rooted in our jurisprudence and codified in N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-19, which states that every person in New Jersey “has a right to refuse to disclose in an action…any matter that will incriminate him or expose him to penalty…” Both the United States Supreme Court and our New Jersey courts… [read post]
29 May 2012, 8:24 am
There were only two pieces of activity since the May 14 update: New Hampshire’s Senate approved May 16 on a voice vote its Judiciary Committee’s recommendation to send (HB 1422) to an interim study committee, effectively killing the bill for 2012. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 3:00 am
Does It Even Matter? [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 8:52 am
One factor being weighed is how much Delaney's involvement in the brief was just a matter of course in his job. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
The Judiciary Committee leaders will vote to authorize subpoenas for information from billionaire Harlan Crow, a close friend and benefactor of Justice Clarence Thomas, and from Leonard Leo, the conservative judicial activist. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 12:54 pm
Jersey Media Group Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
The New Jersey Experience Until recently, New Jersey law looked as though it favored vigorous gatekeeping of invalid expert witness opinion testimony. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 11:19 am
The judiciary must merely refrain from delving into matters concerning religious doctrine. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
One person briefed on the matter said investigators have asked about Trump showing the map while aboard a plane. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:00 am
A new analysis shows how it has helped establish new dynamics in campaigning and fundraising. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 10:20 am
Although such systems have existed throughout some state courts in New York before today, the new initiative will affect all state courts. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
In House Committee on Judiciary. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 12:04 pm
Through the New Jersey State Police If you reside in New Jersey you can obtain a copy of your NJ arrest records through the New Jersey State Police (“NJSP”). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 3:07 pm
From New Hampshire Judicial Ethics Opinion 2017-ACJE-01, decided in 2017 but just posted on Westlaw: QUESTION PRESENTED: Does the Code of Judicial Conduct prohibit judges from hosting podcasts or radio shows devoted to sports or other matters that have little to do with the courts, the law or the legal profession? [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 7:36 am
Ramseur, 106 N.J. 123, 238, n. 51 (1987), (noting that “[e]ach member of the New Jersey judiciary is accountable to no person but only to the law and to his or her oath”). [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 11:43 am
As mentioned above, enforcing the clear and unambiguous language set forth in the proposed legislation is an easier and more efficient prospect for the judiciary of this State because they are no longer required to make the determination as to whether the decision in B.C. v. [read post]
