Search for: "INTERN. TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 337
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2020, 1:09 pm
See, e.g., the President’s National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee, Report to the President on the Internet of Things (November 2014), p. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:37 am
Summary In its judgment, the Supreme Court recognised the tensions inherent in a system of national patent enforcement and a global telecommunications market which is based on standards. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 8:05 am
The same international/interstate v. intrastate distinction applies to so-called “private carrier” service revenues. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 6:47 am
It covers all types of imports and exports of products.[2] Any national measure enacted by Member States which has the effect of hindering, directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, trade in the internal market is to be considered as having an effect equivalent to quantitative restrictions.[3] The Court of Justice of the European Union [“CJEU”] has explained that national measures subjecting the internal trade of goods to prior authorization restrict… [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:49 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
His gaming of the judicial system has revealed weaknesses in our legal process. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 12:00 am
In a dynamic FRAND case between Sisvel and Xiaomi, the Court of Appeal of The Hague (“CoA”) elaborates on this latter aspect of preliminary injunction proceedings.Sisvel is the owner of a standard essential patent related to a so-called EGPRS-system, which is used in the GSM telecommunication standard. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 5:51 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently declined to rehear en banc Fazaga v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:17 am
Article 46(1) GDPR states that where there is no adequacy decision “a controller or processor may transfer personal data to a third country or an international organisation only if the controller or processor has provided appropriate safeguards, and on condition that enforceable data subject rights and effective legal remedies for data subjects are available”. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 4:13 pm
EgyptSaeed Ahmed Hassan v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 5:01 am
” Likewise, in United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
Section 889 prohibits the federal government from directly procuring “any equipment, system or service that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as a part of any system” or entering into a contract with any entity that uses such covered telecommunications equipment or services. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm
[vii] In the aftermath of these two rulings, plaintiffs moved to jurisdictions with more favorable rules to pursue litigation that is detrimental to corporations, their shareholders, director and officer (“D&O”) insurers, and wasteful of judicial system resources as a whole. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 5:27 am
More importantly, it is a strong gesture directed to the international community that Hong Kong's character as an international city has fundamentally changed. [read post]
28 May 2020, 4:04 pm
On May 28, 2020, in the case of United States v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 4:04 pm
On May 28, 2020, in the case of United States v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 6:31 am
United States is unlikely to change that. [read post]
21 May 2020, 12:15 pm
In our case, Alasaad v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 11:19 am
(HC 2109/20 Ben Meir v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 11:33 am
In Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
