Search for: "Icon Health & Fitness" Results 101 - 120 of 330
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2016, 1:26 pm by Naomi Jane Gray
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.,[1] relaxed the applicable standard in construing the Patent Act’s identical fee-shifting provision and will likely result in a lower bar to the recovery of fees in trademark disputes. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 1:26 pm by Naomi Jane Gray
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.,[1] relaxed the applicable standard in construing the Patent Act’s identical fee-shifting provision and will likely result in a lower bar to the recovery of fees in trademark disputes. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 9:02 am by Chain | Cohn | Stiles
 A health and fitness expo and packet pick-up event will also take place from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. on Saturday, Nov. 12, at Buck Owens’ Crystal Palace. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 5:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
… [C]ultural bureaucrats safeguarded not his individual vision, but a socialized understanding of where he fit in the pantheon. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 10:02 pm by Barry Barnett
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 S. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 10:00 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, a 2009 case in which they determined that attorney's fees may be awarded in cases of bad faith. [read post]
6 May 2016, 6:21 am by Tim Sitzmann
Icon Health and Fitness, Inc. decision to trademark claims is gaining traction among federal appellate courts. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 3:01 pm by Eric Caligiuri
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. attorney’s fees awards are becoming more common in patent cases. 35 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 7:22 am by Ronald Mann
Icon Health and Fitness considered the standard for identifying patent cases sufficiently “exceptional” to warrant fee awards. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 1:21 pm by Gene Quinn
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. (2014), a virtually unanimous Supreme Court ruled that the rigid framework crafted by the Federal Circuit to authorize the awarding of attorneys fees was inconsistent with the statutory text and that district courts should be given broad discretion to award attorneys fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285. [read post]