Search for: "Icon Health & Fitness Inc." Results 101 - 120 of 221
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2015, 3:41 pm
 Cisco looks forward to the retrial.After the verdict in the second trial which dealt with inducement, the Supreme Court delivered its decision in Global-Tech Appliances Inc v SEB SA (2011). [read post]
13 May 2015, 6:50 am by Dennis Crouch
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 S. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 5:43 am by Jim Singer
Icon Health & Fitness, the Supreme Court relaxed this standard and gave district courts additional discretion for determining when a case can be considered “exceptional. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:14 am by Gene Quinn
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., was the primary decision simply because that case was treated first by the Court and formed the basis of the Court’s decision in Highmark, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 9:13 pm
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., the Supreme Court also rejected the “rigid” two-part Brooks Furniture test, holding that “an ‘exceptional’ case [warranting attorney fees] is simply one that stands out from others with respect to the substantive strength of a party’s litigating position . . . or the unreasonable manner in which the case was litigated. [read post]