Search for: "In Re: C.P." Results 101 - 120 of 170
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2012, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
The Ohio Supreme Court was busy, too, handing down several decisions, including In re C.P., which we discussed on Friday, finding that lifetime sexual offender registration for juveniles was cruel and unusual punishment. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 4:15 am by Russ Bensing
“Porkjor” got quite a workout in the oral argument I watched the other day, in the Supreme Court’s decision last week in In re C.P. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:14 pm by SO Issues
Original Article Excerpt: In this case we determine the constitutionality of R.C. 2152.86, which creates a new class of juvenile sex-offender registrants: public-registry-qualified juvenile-offender registrants. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:25 pm by Alex Hunt
Breaking news today from the National Juvenile Defender Center (NJDC): Today, the Supreme Court of Ohio issued their opinion in In Re C.P. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 5:53 pm by David Bernstein
(As an aside, the Smith Act, the law that was used to prosecute the C.P. leadership, was passed in 1940. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Bexis
  This common-sense notion, that a warning that’s not read cannot be causal, has been bedrock law in prescription medical product liability litigation for decades: Alabama In re Trasylol Products Liability Litigation, 2011 WL 2117257, at *5 (S.D.Fla. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 12:17 pm by David Lat
We’re already into the middle of October. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm by Bexis
S ome of these we’re still fighting, but with the preemption threat to warning claims removed, most of these have receded into the background.We saw – and see – it a fourth time in PMA medical devices, especially after Riegel v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 10:02 am by Bexis
  See also In re Zyprexa Products Liability Litigation, 2009 WL 1514628, at *12 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
  We’re not aware of this yet being done yet in the United States - by all means tell us if we're wrong - but a litigation hold order precluding plaintiff from deleting social media information was recently issued in Canada. [read post]