Search for: "In Re: Investigating Grand Jury (Complete Opinion)"
Results 101 - 120
of 147
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2013, 8:21 pm
When the Kaleys learned in 2005 that they were the targets of a federal grand jury investigation, they each retained attorneys, who told them that they collectively would charge roughly a half-million dollars for their services through a trial. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm
If the communication is made to the attorney in her capacity as a business adviser, for example, it ought not be privileged”); In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 599 F.2d 504, 511 (2d Cir. 1979) (“Participation of the general counsel does not automatically cloak the investigation with legal garb”). [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 8:44 am
Picking grand jurorsThis Austin Statesman story gives one of the best descriptions you'll see of the nuts and bolts of how grand juries are selected in Travis County - either by appointed commissioners or from the same jury pool as regular jurors. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:15 am
Yeah, like you’re not.) [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 2:51 pm
How are offers born and then re-born?. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm
To successfully promote such ends, the set of dimensions compared must be extensive and broad, including the bases of the different trial forums’ establishment and their stated purposes, their subject-matter jurisdiction, the substantive law they apply and the procedures they follow, the independence of their judges, the professionalism of their advocates, the investigative services that bring them evidence, the legal traditions and cultures they have evolved within, the… [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 12:33 pm
In a criminal matter brought by the Department of Justice Antitrust Division, the Court refused to disturb the conviction of the former chief executive officer of the United Kingdom-based Morgan Crucible Company for conspiring to obstruct a grand jury investigation into price fixing in the carbon products industry. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:41 am
The grand jury investigated an egregious case of political corruption committed by politicians and election workers, but he says the case is about voter impersonation fraud. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:26 am
Ct. 1138 (1896) (dissenting opinion). [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:42 am
At least that’s my opinion, based on my own experience. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 5:50 am
On July 21, 2010, a federal grand jury returned a one-count indictment against Jeffries, charging him with violating U.S. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 5:12 am
Individuals with direct knowledge of the federal inquiry said that prosecutors have impaneled a grand jury, begun calling witnesses and subpoenaed records from LPS [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 9:19 am
Finally, sometimes a fine line separates good re-underwriting and good risk management. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 11:39 pm
” This case, In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 609 F.3d 909 (8th Cir. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 8:22 am
If a person is charged by the grand jury with Aggravated Murder and also charged by the grand jury with a death specification (something that makes Aggravated Murder especially bad), that person is eligible for death. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 5:32 am
In January 2007, a grand jury indicted Faulds with distributing a visual depiction of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct on July 16, 2006, in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 4:29 pm
Jefferson Street Phoenix, Arizona 85003 Re: Our Client: Lisa Randall CR2008-132791 Dear Rick: I hope this letter finds you in good health. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
The city had completely ignored the potential environmental impacts from building more parking supply, which would likely lead to more cars, more congestion, more air pollution, and more greenhouse gas emissions. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 10:43 am
Courts have struggled with balancing the government's interest in discovering evidence of a crime before it is possibly destroyed by the target of a criminal investigation, and the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
