Search for: "In re: Asbestos Products v."
Results 101 - 120
of 263
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2012, 10:31 am
Pa. 1996), rev’d, 148 F.3d 242 (3d Cir. 1997) Asbestos In re Joint E. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(Think about the tertiary asbestos defendants, for example.) [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
PLAC has briefed expert issues involving benzene in New York, Doritos in Pennsylvania, and asbestos in a lot of places. [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 1:19 pm
Beale v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
Rather, it was an asbestos case. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 11:30 am
Nothing resembling this mass consolidation has been seen on the federal level in some twenty years since appellate courts stepped in and called a halt to jumbo asbestos consolidations in Cimino v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm
Id. at *45-46.But we don’t want just to discuss yucky cases, so we’re bookending Block with another pain pump decision, Prather v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 7:52 pm
(In re Savage Indus., Inc.), 43 F.3d 714, 718-23 (1st Cir. 1994) (product liability case against successor not enjoined by "free and clear" sale where tort claim arose before sale but debtor made no effort to notify claimant of sale); Lemelle v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
As far as we can tell it has not yet prevailed in any product liability action. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am
Her decedent had been a heavy smoker for many years, and he had been exposed minimally to asbestos in his office job on the property of an asbestos product manufacturing plant. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 5:51 pm
Supreme Court In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Cramer For Pete's sake! [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 2:57 am
This case concerns mesothelioma and the applicability of the Asbestos Industry Regulations 193, Reg 2(a) to factories not engaged in the manufacture of asbestos products but making lagging paste for insulation in a power station, and whether the appellant was in breach of a statutory duty owed to the respondent under the Factories Act 1937, s 47 because a substantial quantity of asbestos dust had been present when the respondent worked as a lorry driver collecting… [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 11:00 am
See, e.g., In re Silica Products Liab. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 2:50 pm
(2) Can documents shared among partners in a business negotiation be protected by the work product privilege? [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:24 pm
Action No. 720,071 (February 19, 1971) Karjala v Johns-Manville Products Corp., D. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
In fact, product liability law often follows a “needs of the many” approach that supports research, development, and limitation of liability for prescription medical products, where large damage awards can occur in the Wink of an Eye and can result in The Doomsday Machine for such products. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:24 am
Epstein recited the Selikoff multiplicative “synergy” theory, with relative risks of 5 (for non-smoking asbestos workers), 10 (for smoking non-asbestos workers), and 50 (for smoking asbestos-exposed workers). [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 9:44 am
Mar. 26, 2007); In re Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 48 Misc. 3d 460, 483-484 (Sup. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm
More on that, too.Consolidation’s been on our brain a bit, you might say.That’s why we’re beyond pleased by the recent decision in Agrofollajes, S.A. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Much of Selikoff’s asbestos work that was original was wrong. [read post]
