Search for: "In re Admin. Order No. 10"
Results 101 - 120
of 184
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
See In re Olive, Exchane Act Release No. 72274 (admin proc May 29, 2014) ("The complaint also alleged that Susan Olive offered and sold unregistered securities, and acted as an unregistered broker-dealer. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:46 am
., Case No. 2:10-CV-01577-RSM (W.D. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
Yet, as Chancellor Strine suggests (slip op. at Page 8-10 below) the answer to these difficult questions may be avoided entirely if the legislative will is understood merely as a default position from which the parties may contract around to suit their interests (subject of course to their relative bargaining power). [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 10:12 am
MR JUSTICE OUSELEY: I appreciate you’re talking about the substance. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 10:12 am
MR JUSTICE OUSELEY: I appreciate you’re talking about the substance. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:12 pm
The landlord lives overseas and has commissioned a local agent to manage the re-letting of the property. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:30 pm
Robinson (1989), 10 C.H.R.R. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 6:56 am
The Judgment Mrs Justice Lang held that: On the evidence before her, the Mayor of London (Boris Johnson) did not abuse his position as Chair of TfL in order to advance his re-election campaign. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 11:11 pm
The Leveson report has also created a strange accord (or romance, as Adam Wagner would have it in his post on the subject) between the Daily Mail and the Human Rights Act, with the normally rights-bashing newspaper publishing an interview with Shami Chakrabarti (director of Liberty and advisor to the Leveson Inquiry, who has subsequently clarified her comments) in which she argues that making Ofcom the “backstop regulator” with statutory powers to punish newspapers would violate Article… [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
Food and Drug Admin., Case No. 1:12-cv-01105-ABJ (D. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 10:03 pm
Schulman In re eBX LLC, SEC, Admin. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 12:00 am
In UKBR#10 Charon QC wrote the most comprehensive review of UK blawgs that we’ve had so far, comprising four episodes and podcasts and covered just about every Blawg that there is or ever has been. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 9:48 am
B-NY: Sentimental value of prop. held by family for generations doesnt outweigh benefit to crs. from sale per 363(h). http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/Beck-BK-EDNY-Eisenberg-9-6-11.doc … B-FL: No admin. priority for severance pay arising from prepet. empl. agr. just bec employee was employed postpetition. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/RobbStuckyLtd-BK-MD-FL-Delano-9-7-11.doc … B-AZ: Legal mal. cplt. alleging… [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:13 pm
& includes any failure to perform obligs. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/SanchezvNorthwestAir-8th-Bye-10-14-11.pdf … 8th reminds that per SCOTUS' Reading case, costs incident to bs. operation qualify for admin. priority under § 503(b). http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/SanchezvNorthwestAir-8th-Bye-10-14-11.pdf … SDNY: Mere possession of claimant's property w/out actual use by debtor… [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:52 am
There’s a rigidity to the NFU factors that lacks the necessary suppleness—trial courts tend to be mechanical because they don’t want to get reversed, especially not for failing to consider factor 8 of a 10-factor test. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:15 pm
Natural Res. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:22 am
I plan to post these case development summaries in the coming weeks and then reprint them here so they're all collected in one handy place. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 12:31 pm
There now follows a judicial review of the decision to enforce the possession order made in that claim: JL v SS for Defence [2012] EWHC 2216 (Admin) [not yet on Bailii], heard by Justice Simler QC on 30/7/2012.After the making of the possession order in JL1, the Claimant was accepted for the full homelessness duty by Leeds City Council and she was placed in the highest band on the Council’s allocation scheme. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 12:31 pm
There now follows a judicial review of the decision to enforce the possession order made in that claim: JL v SS for Defence [2012] EWHC 2216 (Admin) [not yet on Bailii], heard by Justice Simler QC on 30/7/2012.After the making of the possession order in JL1, the Claimant was accepted for the full homelessness duty by Leeds City Council and she was placed in the highest band on the Council’s allocation scheme. [read post]
