Search for: "In re Application of Keller"
Results 101 - 120
of 129
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2010, 12:54 pm
Proposed changes to the Ethics Rules applicable to all lawyers licensed to practice in the State of Texas have been made by the Texas Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
(China Law Blog) Stronger new tort laws will better protect IP rights in China (China Blawg) The Supreme People’s Court’s interpretation on how law’s applied for patent infringement trials (China Blawg) Copyright protection for your brand when trademark protection is unavailable (China Law Insight) That’s hot: China distribution contracts – trademark protection (China Law Blog) ITC holds two days of public hearings on intellectual property infringement in China (ITC Law… [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
(China Law Blog) Stronger new tort laws will better protect IP rights in China (China Blawg) The Supreme People’s Court’s interpretation on how law’s applied for patent infringement trials (China Blawg) Copyright protection for your brand when trademark protection is unavailable (China Law Insight) That’s hot: China distribution contracts – trademark protection (China Law Blog) ITC holds two days of public hearings on intellectual property infringement in China… [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 2:50 pm
In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 425 (CCPA 1981). [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
(Maier & Maier) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Defendant may defeat false patent marking claim by showing no intent to deceive: Pequignot v Solo Cup Company (IP Spotlight) (Patently-O) (GRAY on Claims) (Florida IP) (Inventive Step) Two Strykes and you're out - Fed. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 9:26 am
Better yet, John goes farther, explaining that In re Keller is applicable only to a specific fact situation, and is not applicable to the general case as used by many Examiners. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 1:41 pm
One of my recent replies read, "Applicant does not disagree with the well-established principles set forth by In re Keller. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:09 am
[Here’s a link to the CCA case information if you’re interested.]Commentary: The State really dodged a bullet with this one. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:08 am
They’re like experts. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 11:19 am
From the Commission on Judicial Conduct's website, here are links to all documents filed with the commission in the case: In re: Judge Sharon Keller (Judge No. 96) Notice of Formal Proceedings (file stamped) [pdf]Judge Keller Answer [pdf] Exhibits: A-B [1.07 MB pdf] | C-D [309 KB pdf] | E [2.18 MB pdf] | F-H [752 KB pdf] | I-K [372 KB pdf] | L-P [1.29 MB pdf] Agreed Request for Setting [pdf]Order Setting Hearing [pdf]Appointment of Special Master [pdf]First… [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 6:55 am
Presiding Judge Keller, writing for the majority, explained that the rationale for allowing cognizability of a limitations claim does not extend to challenges under the IAD. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:56 am
{This requirement is not applicable to smaller reporting companies.} [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 11:52 am
According to the CCA’s order in In Re Dow and Black, the two TDS attorneys filed a subsequent application for a writ of habeas corpus and a motion to stay the Nov. 18 execution of Danielle Simpson in the 3rd District Court in Anderson County at 4:08 p.m. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 10:06 am
Hubert Keller Award to the person who gets HHs for 5 semesters but doesn't quite cross the finish line? [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 10:04 am
[And really Presiding Judge Keller's opinion gives a quick understanding of what this case was about and why it was probably ultimately published. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 4:34 am
Presiding Judge Keller dissentd without an opinion. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
Presiding Judge Keller dissented without an opinion.Here's a link to the CCA case information. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 10:01 pm
Smith mixed Star Trek with In re Volkswagen II and In re TS Tech to achieve "j2 II Leaves Spacedock". [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 10:12 am
Four judges would've dismissed the application (Keller, P.J., and Meyers, Keasler, Hervey, JJ.)Interestingly, the Court sent it back for a hearing with instructions for a specific inquiry into the "Flynn effect". [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 12:37 am
.In re Matt Johnson. [read post]
