Search for: "In re Applied Materials, Inc."
Results 101 - 120
of 2,704
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2017, 11:12 am
This rationale was applied in the recent decision of In re Solera Holdings, Inc. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 5:00 am
The FTC Act prohibits companies from unilaterally applying material privacy policy changes to previously collected data. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 3:24 am
November 3, 2016 - 10 AM: In re Orbit Irrigation Products, Inc., Serial Nos. 85945749 et al. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 3:17 am
Cir. 2018); In re Cordua Rests., Inc., 118 USPQ2d 1632, 1638 (Fed. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 5:45 am
The court did, however, dismiss the claims against one of the committee members who joined the company after the lawsuit, as well as the aiding and abetting claims against the other parties to the merger transaction (In re AmTrust Financial Services, Inc. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Securities and Exchange Command#39;n, 297 F.2d 112, 115 (2d Cir.1961)(failure to disclose information lack of basis is an omission of a material fact). [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
"Applicant Digital Oilfield, Inc. contended that none of the PTO materials evidence use of the term in connection with the identified goods and services. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
[He] has no basis to apply his opinions reliably to the pharmaceutical industry. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:23 am
Highwoods Props., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:01 pm
In re Applied Materials, Inc., 692 F.3d 1289, 1297 (Fed. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm
Plaintiff applied and was approved for three "Law Access" loans between 2000 and 2002 (the "Access Loans"), one loan for each year she attended law school. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:23 am
See In re Cygnus Tele- comms. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 5:00 am
According to the petitioner, the First, Second, Third, Fifth, Eight, and Eleventh Circuits have held that American Pipe tolling does not apply to serial class actions, particularly when an attempt to certify a materially identical class has already been rejected. [read post]
14 May 2019, 6:00 am
After trial and an adverse judgment in the amount for $148 million for breach of the duty of loyalty in a going private merger In re Dole Food Co., Inc. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 7:44 pm
In re: Family Dollar Stores, Inc. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:41 pm
On July 14, 2010, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, in the case of In Re: Pfizer Inc. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
Disclosure Relating to the Financial Analyses Underlying a Fairness Opinion In re Openlane, Inc. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 3:29 am
Amax Lighting, Inc., 115 U.S.P.Q.2d 1242, 1249 (T.T.A.B. 2015).Applying that framework, the Board found that Fuji was the owner of the mark. [read post]
13 May 2014, 7:55 pm
See Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2013, 7:25 pm
StemCells, Inc.' [read post]
