Search for: "In re David V." Results 101 - 120 of 4,496
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2012, 3:38 pm by Glenn Reynolds
DAVID BERNSTEIN CORRECTS THE RECORD: It seems that liberal commenters on constitutional law just can’t resist bringing of the issue of child labor, regardless of whether what they’re saying is historically accurate. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 11:50 am
Stat. (2014) (emphasis added).David v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 9:55 am
Here’s a great article by David Pannick on the legal year that was 2007. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:44 pm
Today AG Carter has issued a release re Judge David Hamilton's ruling issued June 24th in John Doe v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 3:13 pm
  Or at least that was the sex that gave rise to the pregnancy -- and we're talking about specific jurisdiction, so we care about the contacts that gave rise to the cause of action, not those contacts (like other sex) that didn't give rise to the child at issue.Sex in Nebraska, albeit with a California resident, doesn't create specific jurisdiction in California.As I said, that seems likely right.The only thing that gives me slight pause in that conclusion is the… [read post]
22 May 2015, 5:42 am
Horses eat on holidays, so you're on properties and work 24/7 in the horse business. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 12:09 am
 Goldman Sachs then front runs those trades.Front running works like this: Imagine you're going to sell some stock. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 3:28 pm by Stewart Baker
They're focusing on compromising the money launderers – and then their customers. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:01 am by Transplanted Lawyer
There are two meaty things to note about the opinion in Perry v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:07 am by Eugene Volokh
New York's efforts to punish the National Rifle Association, at issue before the Supreme Court in National Rifle Association v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 2:48 am by Emma Cross
  [1] R (Barclay) v Secretary of State for Justice & Ors [2009] UKSC 9 [2] R (Barclay & Anor) v Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor, The Committee for the Affairs of Jersey and Guernsey and Her Ma [read post]
The EU Commission’s rejection of the Hairdressers’ Agreement as well as the decision in European Federation of Public Service Unions (EPSU) and Jan Willem Goudriaan v European Commission, Case T–310/18, 24 October 2019 come to mind. [read post]