Search for: "In re Melendez" Results 101 - 120 of 140
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2010, 12:30 pm by Alain Leibman
(To be sure, as discussed in an earlier post, under the Confrontation Clause and Melendez-Diaz, the government could have been required to present live witness testimony about the testing rather than rely on mere reports of the results). [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 11:24 pm
Some agencies require informed consent to get DNA, but it's legal to lie to get DNA samples, DNA in someone's trashcan is fair game, and you don't need probable cause to take a DNA sample under current law, the gathering was told in a seminar titled DNA 101.The legal eagles among you may be interested that the Supreme Court recently granted cert (meaning they agreed to hear the case) in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:44 am by James Bickford
The Boston Globe reported on the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s retroactive application of Melendez-Diaz to drug trials held from 2005 to 2009. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 12:27 pm by Richard D. Friedman
I think that in light of Melendez-Diaz and Bullcoming, the Cellmark report here must clearly be considered testimonial. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 6:23 am by Susan Brenner
In making this argument, Cameron relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 4:26 am by Chris Seaton
Young, if you’re reading this, please don’t kill me. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
  That’s what we’re going to take a look at today. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 1:49 pm
Washington got it right for the most part; Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 10:17 pm
Washington got it right for the most part; Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 9:11 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The room is located on the entrance level of the building.Special guests will be six innocent death row exoneress: Shujaa Graham, Curtis McCarty, Ron Keine, Derrick Jamison, Perry Cobb and Juan Melendez. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 3:21 am
  Especially if you’re only 19. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 4:47 am by Gritsforbreakfast
It does make me confident, though, that SCOTUS decided the Melendez-Diaz case properly last year when they found that defendants had the right to cross-examine lab workers whose reports are presented as evidence at trial. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 8:11 pm
Day by day, they're remaking their corners of the profession. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 12:42 pm by Nathan
  They’re already allowed to contribute to campaigns, what, they’re going to be allowed to vote or run for office, too? [read post]