Search for: "In re N.C" Results 101 - 120 of 1,076
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2022, 9:29 am by Timothy Heinle
See In re B.S., 378 N.C. 1, ¶ 9 (2021) (discussing, in the appeal of an order terminating a parent’s rights, what constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel). [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 6:00 am by Jacquelyn Greene
In re D.L.H., 198 N.C.App. 286, 292 (2009), rev’d on other grounds, 364 N.C. 214 (2010). [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 9:48 am by Bill Marler
“That way, you’re not mixing potential contamination with the main path that a pathogen takes to get into your body. [read post]
19 May 2022, 5:24 am by Brittany Williams
On appeal, the defendant argued that the trial court erred in denying his petition to terminate his requirement to register as a sex offender because the Court’s holding in In re Borden, 216 N.C. [read post]
18 May 2022, 5:53 am by Shea Denning
The Court of Appeals held earlier this month in In re Public Records Request to DHHS, 2022-COA-284, ___ N.C. [read post]
7 May 2022, 12:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
See, e.g., Powell, 65 N.C. at 709 (defendant not charged with any prior crime); Worthy, 63 N.C. at 203 (defendant not charged with any crime); In re Tate, 63 N.C. 308 (1869) (defendant not charged with any crime); Gerard N. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
[I blogged an early draft of this essay three months ago, but I've revised it extensively since then. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Sixth Circuit: Right, but they're not in the town because of the zoning decision. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 11:57 am by John Floyd
.), Sam Erwin (D-N.C.), and James Eastland (D. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
We're not saying we don't appreciate the Hamilton references strewn throughout this Fifth Circuit opinion, we're just saying we're disappointed the dissent did not challenge the majority to a rap battle. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The Federal Election Commission Slapped Marathon Petroleum Corporation with a $85,000 Fine After It Illegally Contributed $1 Million to 2 Republican PACs Yahoo News – Bryan Metzger (Business Insider) | Published: 3/18/2022 The FEC levied a $85,000 fine against Marathon Petroleum Company after it illegally contributed $1 million to a pair of PACs supporting House and Senate Republicans’ re-election campaigns. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am by Eugene Volokh
Louisiana, 379 U.S. 64, 67 (1964) (taking the same view as Herbert); In re Gronowicz, 764 F.2d 983, 988 & n.4 (3d Cir. 1985) (en banc) (likewise); Phelps v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 8:11 am by Dan Bressler
‘The solution is to have a clean division.'” “Some institutions aren’t even debating this issue because they’re handling investigations internally—and they’re making a mess. [read post]