Search for: "In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against"
Results 101 - 120
of 141
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2013, 7:01 am
It is one of only four states that remove disciplinary and medical malpractice actions after 10 years. [read post]
27 May 2012, 3:19 pm
In re Dore, 07 CH 122 (Review Board, Feb. 25, 2011), petition for leave to file exceptions denied, No. [read post]
26 May 2012, 5:55 pm
The case was re-listed for 6 June 2012. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 11:05 am
See the disciplinary actions for more detailed explanations). [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:54 am
These petitions were thus subject to BAPCPA. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:52 pm
(See this news release for a link to download a .pdf of the petition - h/t: Pageantmaster.) [read post]
28 May 2011, 7:56 am
He should not act in a bankruptcy petition when he himself is also a creditor of the bankrupt.II. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:14 pm
(iv) prove the services rendered to a client, or the reasonable value thereof, or both, in an action against another person or organization responsible for the payment of the fee for services rendered to the client. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:57 am
Zehner considered three actions by the Board to constitute reprimands, or punishments, in the nature of disciplinary actions taken against him and petitioned Supreme Court for an order directing the board "to cease disciplining him until it appoints an arbitrator to conduct a hearing on his 3020-a charges. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 2:55 am
Patsalos to grant the Town’s petition to stay the arbitration; the Appellate Division, Second Department, reversed.The Appellate Division pointed out that the arbitrator in the disciplinary action apparently did not directly address the question of whether, pursuant to the parties’ collective bargaining agreement, the employee could be suspended without pay for more than 30 days pending disposition of the disciplinary charges against him.The… [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 11:28 pm
s actions throughout the disciplinary process constitute substantial aggravating circumstances requiring a concomitant increase in sanction.Ooops. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 11:00 pm
City and County of Oakland is a civil rights action. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:08 am
On March 11, 1996, the district initiated a second Section 3020-a disciplinary action against DeMichele. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
On February 26, 2009 the Center filed a class-action suit under 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Ciavarella, Conahan, their wives and their confederates in the scheme, by this time coming to be known as the “kids for cash” conspiracy. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 3:24 am
Blauvelt moved for summary judgment and the Appellate Division agreed on the grounds that the issues and facts raised by Parker were the same in both actions.The court noted that Parker had a “full and fair opportunity to challenge and defend against them” and therefore, even if the remedy sought under 42 USC 1983 was different from those he had sought in his Article 78 action, further consideration of his 42 USC 1983 claims were barred by the doctrine of res… [read post]
26 May 2010, 2:38 pm
If you're a New Yorker, please join us! [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 3:35 am
Settlement of a lawsuit “with prejudice” bars a second action based on similar allegations involving the same partiesBenjamin v New York City Dept. of Health, 57 AD3d 403The Appellate Division dismissed the petition filed by Sislyn Benjamin alleging unlawful discrimination because a prior state court action containing the same claims set out in her petition was discontinued with prejudice by stipulation of the parties and thus constitutes res… [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 12:45 pm
In later civil actions or ITC proceedings, the challenger is estopped from asserting the invalidity of a claim on any ground that was “raised” during the post-grant review. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 9:03 am
In re Pers. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
In re Chambers, cause number 14-02-00020-CV in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals.The Fourteenth Court of Appeals issued an opinion on February 7, 2002, denying appellants’ petition for writ of mandamus. [read post]
