Search for: "In re Weapons Restriction of J."
Results 101 - 120
of 143
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2018, 7:53 pm
" (Office of the President, "Fact Sheet: President Donald J. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 8:02 am
§ 12:22 (3d ed.) was cited in ¶ 205,195 THERSIA J. [read post]
27 Aug 2016, 6:05 pm
And worse--globalization appears to have been weaponized in some of its forms (e.g., here). [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm
The Transparency project discusses the Re X judgment and the issue of transparency versus confidentiality. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 11:23 am
The book then turns to "emerging" topics in the jus in bello such as drone warfare, weapons law, cyberwarfare, and private military contractors. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 10:10 am
J. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 11:24 pm
— Chillian J. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 10:41 am
Should the exemption nonetheless be denied, perhaps on the grounds that allowing blunt knives would either let people carry sharp knives claiming they’re blunt, or require too much checking on the part of police, guards, and others? [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 4:22 pm
On 14 December 2014 a further article was published claiming that “Action against Drugs” rented out deadly weapons. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 11:57 am
District Judge Richard J. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 9:43 am
If you're fortunate enough to use a bail bondsman to post your bail - you will pay between 10 to 15% of the "face amount" of the bail to gain your freedom. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:15 pm
Clarke Michael J. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm
If the university wants to restrict First Amendment protected behavior by students, it has to at least provide clear notice of what it is restricting, even in a nonpublic forum or a limited public forum. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm
On the other hand, members of the House of Representatives answer to the people of their district, and do so often, standing for re-election on short cycles (Art. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm
In Descamps, Justice Kagan wrote for the Supreme Court on an issue that permeates our work as federal defenders: what impact do prior convictions have on our clients’ freedom? [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 7:02 am
So, if you're an criminal appellate practitioner (on the defense side), our hope is that this will soon be one stop shopping for 28(j) letters. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
See, e.g., In re Synchronoss Sec. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm
I quote below the body of the argument in the brief, minus the footnotes; but if you’re interested in the issue, you might just want to read the PDF. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:10 pm
But that restriction does not apply until the officer concludes that the object at issue is not a weapon. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:48 am
If you’re a bit more roll-your own, you can cobble together you’re own glue-extruding mess from instructions . [read post]
