Search for: "In the Matter of: T., Steven William"
Results 101 - 120
of 560
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
[UPDATE: Francis Pileggi has his take (courtesy of a guest blogger), as does Steven Davidoff at DealBook.] [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 1:18 pm
The seven justices in the majority were Warren Burger, William O. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 5:41 am
(William Shakespeare, HAMLET, Act III, Scene 2.) [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 12:54 pm
I don't know if he actually saw any of the solitary confinement sensory deprivation cages that are part of the "supermax" federal prisons. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 5:48 am
Of course, these options aren’t mutually exclusive. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 8:54 pm
I am open to correction on this point, if you are genuinely expert in these matters. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 11:24 am
Steven T. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
I don’t view the matter in either/or terms; all dissentals/dissentants and concurrals/concurrants are designed to convey information sooner rather than later, and to a variety of audiences for whom time may be of the essence. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 5:12 am
That means it goes to the evilness of the conduct.Breyer seems to indicate that he would not stand in the way of a 100-1 ratio in the right circumstances.Thus, even if Kennedy and Souter (both part of the State Farm decision) as well as new justices Alito and Roberts all voted for the strictest ratios possible on punitive damages, it wouldn't seem to matter with the current court composition. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:50 am
Using originalist topics to make originalist arguments doesn't make you an originalist-- it doesn't mean that you generally subscribe to a theory of originalist interpretation-- any more than making arguments that don't concern original meaning-- for example, arguments about precedent or consequences--makes you a non-originalist. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:50 am
Using originalist topics to make originalist arguments doesn't make you an originalist-- it doesn't mean that you generally subscribe to a theory of originalist interpretation-- any more than making arguments that don't concern original meaning-- for example, arguments about precedent or consequences--makes you a non-originalist. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 8:52 am
If his firm drops salaries contemporaneously with anyone else, it won't matter who went "first," it will be translated by associates as a warning that the firm is in financial trouble. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
” Then, he added, “if you don’t give Ruth Ginsburg a try, please don’t come to me in future years for clerk recommendations. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:17 pm
Stevens, the case about depictions of animal cruelty. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 6:08 am
can't grasp the most rudimentary principles of state building.Pulse: poll says 47% not interested at all in wedding of Prince William and Kate Middleton. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 11:31 pm
Nobody who mattered didn’t, at least, and the committee voted 5-0 to recommend passing the bill. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 5:25 am
As Justice Stevens, noted in his dissent, “The nuance eludes me. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 8:47 am
It also doesn’t really matter which clerk writes the opinion because nearly Every Justice who uses footnotes uses them in almost ever case. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 6:11 am
Thank you to William Erlanger, CPA of Levy, Erlanger & Co. and Steven Schonwit, CPA of the Schonwit Consulting Group for their assistance with this question. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 7:39 am
Why can't Spolter keep his mouth shut? [read post]
