Search for: "Industrial Life Insurance Co. v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 232
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2016, 3:58 pm
(United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Indian Harbor Insurance Co. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 7:53 am
In the second case (its 2002 decision in Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Co. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 5:46 am
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm
Industrial knowledge/creative knowledge. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am
Aetna Life Insurance Company, 13-130. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
The Fredericksburg Care Company LP v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 7:20 am
In so ruling, the Court disapproved of the reasoning in the Sixth Circuit’s 1983 decision in International Union, United Auto, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers of Am. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 9:49 pm
Cir. 2013) (generating rule-based tasks for processing an insurance claim); Bancorp Servs., L.L.C. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
” Sorrell v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
Aetna Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 6:05 am
Niven v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 3:11 pm
(granting summary judgment in favor of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company). [read post]
30 May 2014, 9:20 am
Aetna Life Insurance Co. involves a dispute under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) that arose from the denial of long-term disability benefits for petitioner Sharon Thurber, who was injured in an automobile accident. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
Scott Paper Co. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
California Building Industry Assn. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
” Co-operation of Labor, Leland Stanford (May 4, 1887) at 2. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:36 pm
Gardner 13-379Issue: Whether New York prevailing wage rates are minimum labor standards under Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
American United Life Insurance Company 13-536Issue: Whether the court below erroneously held, in conflict with the decisions of six other circuits, that a person who exercises some authority or control over the assets of an ERISA plan is a fiduciary with respect to that plan only if he is alleged to have “mismanaged” the plan’s assets. [read post]
