Search for: "Interface, Inc."
Results 101 - 120
of 1,079
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2010, 2:53 pm
Apple Inc. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 6:28 am
BELLEVUEâ€â [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 2:06 pm
Whether copyright protection extends to a software interface. 1. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 10:00 am
The CAFC cited Phonometrics, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:35 am
Patent attorneys for Hill-Rom Services, Inc., Hill-Rom Company, Inc. and Hill-Rom Manufacturing, Inc. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 10:11 am
See, e.g., Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:23 am
" Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 4:57 am
" Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 5:58 am
(Oracle America, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:30 am
., Inc., et al., C.A. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 1:36 pm
Google Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 7:44 am
Zillow Group, Inc., October 17, 2022, Hughes, T.). [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 6:49 pm
Earlier this month, the EHB issued a decision in Citizens Advocates United to Safeguard the Environment, Inc. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 7:29 am
SoFi, short for Social Finance Inc., is a California-based online personal finance company and bank. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 7:29 am
SoFi, short for Social Finance Inc., is a California-based online personal finance company and bank. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 3:42 am
Apple Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:21 am
The expert had attributed 30% of the value of the accused products to the asserted bus interface department. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 9:06 pm
One class of accused products “includes memory controller products that incorporate double data rate (“DDR”) memory controllers and DDRx memory controllers,” and another class of accused products “includes peripheral interface products having certain peripheral interfaces. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
Mersinger Regarding Enforcement Actions Against: 1) Opyn, Inc.; 2) Deridex, Inc.; and 3) ZeroEx, Inc. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 2:25 am
In re Apple, Inc., Serial Nos. 77616247, 77844718, and 77844736 (August 28, 2012) [not precedential].Mere Descriptiveness: The PTO asserted that OPENCL "immediately identifies the common or generic name of an industry standard language and application programming interface," and therefore cannot be a trademark. [read post]
