Search for: "J Ashcroft" Results 101 - 120 of 241
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
Among the important questions that will need to be answered in connection with the current wave of failed bank litigation is the question of extent to which the non-director officers will be able to defend themselves in reliance on the business judgment rule. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:55 am by INFORRM
Finally, judgments were given by nine different first instance judges as follows: Tugendhat J – seventeen; Eady J – three; Bean J – two; HHJ Parkes QC – two; Sharp, Slade, Vos, Hildyard and Lindblom JJ, one each. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:43 am by INFORRM
  First, the Court of Appeal (Pill and Elias LJJ and Sharp J) handed down judgment in the case of Ashcroft v Foley ([2012] EWCA Civ 423). [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday 27 March 2012 Tugendhat J gave judgment in the case of SKA v CRH, (heard 19 March 2012). [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by INFORRM
On Monday 19 March 2012, Tugendhat J reserved judgment on hearing of the return date in the non-media privacy injunction case of SKA v CRH. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by INFORRM
There was a further hearing before Tugendhat J on 16 March 2012. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:50 am by INFORRM
On Friday 9 March 2012, Eady J heard another application to amend the defence in the case of Hunt v Times Newspap [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:24 am by INFORRM
On the same day Eady J handed down judgment in Tamiz v Google, ([2012] EWHC 449 (QB)). [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm by INFORRM
Vos J reserved judgment on the extent of the redactions. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
The return date was on Thursday 16 February 2012 before Tugendhat J. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
In the Courts On Monday 6 February 2012, Tugendhat J gave a number of ex tempore rulings in the libel case of Bento v Chief Constable of Bedfordshire Police. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal (Pill and Elias LJJ and Sharp J) heard the appeal against the decision of Eady J in Ashcroft v Foley ([2011] EWHC 1710 (QB)), as reported above. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
  This was a Norwich Pharmacal case where an order had been made originally on 30 September 2011 by Lindblom J. [read post]