Search for: "JOHNSON v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH" Results 101 - 120 of 526
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2014, 7:30 am by Jessica Smith
Johnson, 57 F.3d 1305, 1313-14 (4th Cir. 1995) (victim’s files at a medical center, county mental health department, and county DSS); State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 3:34 pm by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
Input Needed in Providers Opioid Audit   The Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation (TDI-DWC) acknowledges that prescription drug abuse and misuse, including opioids, is a serious issue in all health care delivery systems, including workers’ compensation. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:31 pm by WSLL
WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, TOM FORSLUND, Director, TOM JOHNSON, Chemical Testing Supervisor, JAMES L. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Jillian Moss
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a proposed rule that would implement a section of the Affordable Care Act that prohibits discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm by Marty Lederman
 (When it later moved the INS from the Department of Justice to DHS, Congress transferred this and other authorities from the Attorney General to the DHS Secretary.)When the Texas v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the March 22, March 29, April 12, April 18 and April 26 conferences)   Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
What constitutes a public purpose is defined broadly and "encompasses any use which contributes to the health, safety, general welfare, convenience or prosperity of the community" (Matter of 225 Front St., Ltd. v City of Binghamton, 61 AD3d 1155, 1157 [3d Dept 2009] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Johnson v Town of Caroga, 162 AD3d 1353, 1355 [3d Dept 2018]; see Matter of Court St. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
What constitutes a public purpose is defined broadly and "encompasses any use which contributes to the health, safety, general welfare, convenience or prosperity of the community" (Matter of 225 Front St., Ltd. v City of Binghamton, 61 AD3d 1155, 1157 [3d Dept 2009] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Johnson v Town of Caroga, 162 AD3d 1353, 1355 [3d Dept 2018]; see Matter of Court St. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:21 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board, heard 22 and 23 July 2014. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 6:37 am by Kiran Bhat
Finally, the Department of Justice admitted yesterday that it inadvertently erred when, during the 2009 arguments in Nken v. [read post]