Search for: "James v. Cox" Results 101 - 120 of 162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
  The first, Gold v Cox ([2012] EWHC 272 (QB)) concerned the threatened publication of a book about Jacqueline Gold, the chief executive of Ann Summers. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 11:53 pm by INFORRM
It includes letters from Rebekah Brooks, James Murdoch, Tom Crone, Linklaters, Colin Myler and Neville Thurlbeck. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
With that said, the book provides insights relevant to analyzing the Court’s recent decision in Trump v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:12 am by Scott Bomboy
In 1941, Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes wrote for a unanimous Court in Cox v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm by INFORRM
Resolved complaints include: Mrs Lorna Leckie v The Scottish Sun, Mr Andrew Curtis v The Sun, Dr Kalind Parashar v Daily Mail and Councillor James Moher v Brent & Kilburn Times. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am by Jonathan Shaub
In the context of congressional oversight, the executive branch has thus largely been, as Cox wrote, “left to itself. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
 That is the central reason why James Madison, seconded by James Wilson, first moved on June 1 that the Executive be vested with the power “to appoint to offices in cases not otherwise provided for. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
United States Actor James Woods has settled a defamation claim over a Tweet calling him a “cocaine addict”. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 6:55 am by Bernard Bell
  Archibald Cox, being sworn in as Watergate Special Prosecutor The Attorney General and the Department of Justice have the power to bring criminal prosecutions in the name of the United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2007, 9:44 am by Tobias Thienel
Henderson (1843) 3 Hare 100, in which Sir James Wigram V-C said at pp. 114-115 (the case is not online, but the quote appears at para. 55 of Aldi Stores Ltd. v. [read post]