Search for: "John Doe Inc 1-2"
Results 101 - 120
of 2,449
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2013, 4:19 am
My understanding is that a genericness refusal is just that, while a mere descriptiveness refusal falls under 2(e)(1), the failure under 2(f) merely meaning that the 2(e)(1) refusal has not been overcome.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 12:46 pm
Direct Wholesalers,Inc., John Doe 1-5 Case Number: 0:2008cv60339 The Lake Doctors, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:15 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, 17-1077 Issue: Whether a misstatement claim that does not meet the elements set forth in Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 3:29 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 3:33 am
In its petition, B&B presents the following questions:1. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 6:12 pm
The third precedential TTAB decision of 2007 found the Board affirming a Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusal of the mark THEATL for magazines, a weekly newspaper, and a section of a newspaper -- all concerning Atlanta, Georgia. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:13 am
The Board affirmed a refusal to register the logo shown immediately below, for "clothing, namely, t-shirts, sweatshirts, tank tops and tops," under Sections 1, 2, and 45, finding it to be "primarily an ornamental feature of the goods" that "does not function as a trademark for the goods. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 7:52 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 4:59 am
Where does the concurrent use issue come from in this Section 2(d) opposition to a trademark for pizza? [read post]
11 May 2011, 3:12 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 7:11 am
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17 (1966): (1) the scope and content of the prior art; (2) the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue; (3) the level of ordinary skill in the relevant art; and (4) objective evidence of nonobviousness, if present. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 9:58 pm
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17 (1966), cited with approval in KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Hill-Rom Serv., Inc., at *2 (text added). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 2:34 am
" Burl Ilex.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
14 May 2009, 2:54 am
Applicant epcSolutions, Inc. found out the answer to that question in In re epcSolutions, Inc., Serial No. 76675389 (May 1, 2009) [not precedential]. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 12:23 am
While more accurate than John Simpson's earlier inaccurate ramblings on the re-examof the WARF patents, IPBiz adds some text. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 8:32 pm
In re Thor Tech, Inc., Serial No. 78487208 (October 31, 2007) [precedential].Section 1(b)(2) requires that an application "include specification ... of the goods. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 2:52 am
In re VacationFutures Inc., Serial No. 86634983 (August 22, 2016) [not precedential].Mere Descriptiveness: Applicant VacationFutures did not address the Section 2(e)(1) refusal in its appeal brief, but the Board reviewed the refusal anyway. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:30 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
