Search for: "Jonathan Masur"
Results 101 - 120
of 229
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2017, 9:38 am
Jonathan Masur: is the argument that there are strands of republicanism or that republicanism is a dominant theme? [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:30 pm
In a recent paper, Professors Jonathan Masur and Eric Posner of the University of Chicago Law School examine the arguments behind countercyclical regulation, the conditions under which it makes practical sense, and its viability as a regulatory framework. [read post]
17 May 2017, 9:30 pm
As Professor Jonathan Masur of the University of Chicago Law School has argued, “the bill thus represents a significant and positive step in the direction of rational and cost-justified regulation. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:22 am
Masur. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 12:32 pm
Interesting analysis by my colleagues Daniel Hemel, Jonathan Masur, and Eric Posner. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 6:48 pm
Check out Daniel Hemel, Jonathan Masur, and Eric Posner's (all U. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 5:50 pm
"How Antonin Scalia's Ghost Could Block Donald Trump's Wall": Law professors Daniel Hemel, Jonathan Masur, and Eric Posner have this op-ed online at The New York Times. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm
Masur and Eric A. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 6:00 am
Wilson (Clemson), Carole Emberton (SUNY-Buffalo), Jonathan Gienapp (Stanford).Again, I know my non-scientific methodology (conference programs, google searches, names in my inbox) has left out lots of people who should be on this list. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 11:50 am
For example, Jonathan Masur has argued that the high costs of obtaining a patent disproportionately select against socially harmful patents, and Stephen Yelderman suggests a number of more fine-grained way to rationalize application fees. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 3:30 am
Jonathan S. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:07 pm
But in our article Deference Mistakes, Jonathan Masur and I found that courts make these kinds of mistakes all the time. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 1:55 pm
Jonathan Masur has persuasively argued that “any defendant who challenges a strong and worthwhile patent by infringing, and loses at trial, should be made to pay for having created a risk that the patent will be mistakenly invalidated. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:40 am
Doug Melamed notes that a delayed injunction doesn't solve the problem of lock-in costs.Erik Hovenkamp & Jonathan Masur, Reliable Problems from Unreliable Patent Damages – Basing damages on past licenses creates perverse incentives to avoid licensing at anything less than a low rate, thereby cutting off the bottom of the licensing market and creating substantial deadweight loss. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 4:24 pm
But as Jonathan Masur notes in CBA at the PTO, the PTO regularly promulgates regulations without following CBA procedures. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 8:28 am
” Jonathan Masur, who has argued that administrative law doctrines should apply in patent law, generously agreed to respond. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 1:32 pm
(For an example of this argument in patent law, see Jonathan Masur’s Supreme Court Review article, “Regulating Patents”;(...)As I see it, courts generally don’t apply administrative law doctrines when reviewing the decisions of the PTO and DOJ for a good reason: Patent law and criminal law predate the regulatory state, and they work using different mechanisms. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 2:00 am
Northwestern University Pritzker School of LawJonathan Masur, University of Chicago Law School, presents today as part of the Soshnick Colloquium on Law and Economics: Unquantified Benefits and Bayesian Cost-Benefit Analysis. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 9:47 am
Jonathan Masur is the John P. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 9:47 am
Jonathan Masur is the John P. [read post]
