Search for: "Jones v. City of Columbia" Results 101 - 120 of 131
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 6:45 am by Jay Willis
City of Chicago, Nina Totenberg at NPR predicts that a decision in favor of the petitioners will lead to a “torrent of other cases…that test a huge array of existing gun regulations. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:20 am by Cathy Reno
City of Chicago case, in which the Court will consider whether its 2008 landmark decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 10:05 am by Eugene Volokh
The second issue, in light of District of Columbia v Heller (__US__, 128 S Ct 2783 [2008]), unquestionably presents fair ground for litigation. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
., will pay the civil penalty under terms of an administrative consent agreement filed today by EPA Region 7 in Kansas City, Kan. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
., will pay the civil penalty under terms of an administrative consent agreement filed today by EPA Region 7 in Kansas City, Kan. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EPO: Should green technology be subject to compulsory licensing? [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Partnership for New York City, Inc., amicus curiae. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:18 pm
  Ian Boyko, Canadian Federation of Students Expand fair dealing in line with the case of CHH v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 2:14 am
  Ian Boyko, Canadian Federation of Students Expand fair dealing in line with the case of CHH v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 12:51 am
A report by the receiver in Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
City of Stamford, 699 A.2d 52, 55 & n.8 (Conn. 1997). [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 1:36 pm
The case is Curators of the University of Missouri v. [read post]