Search for: "Judge Hardwick"
Results 101 - 120
of 188
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
Hardwick, would remain the law of the land for seventeen years. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:01 am
Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986). [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 10:41 pm
Hardwick. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 11:21 am
Hardwick, 478 U. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:55 pm
Hardwick that was truly empathetic: empathetic with the the legislators, citizens, and lawmen of Georgia who passed, supported, and enforced the anti-sodomy law that the Supreme Court upheld in that case (to take another random example that comes to mind). [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 4:54 pm
Hardwick, which had consequences far beyond the constitutional affirmation of sodomy laws. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:27 pm
Hardwick, the 1986 case in which a narrow majority upheld the constitutionality of anti-sodomy laws. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 12:40 pm
And the dissent seems to be sympathetic to a breed-specific presumption: Our memorandum decision issued in Hardwick v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 10:59 am
Hardwick (1986) to illustrate to readers how certiorari works, as well as internal drafts of opinions written in Miranda v. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 9:05 pm
In one case, attorneys sought to misgender transgender litigants and, when denied their request by the judge, they requested the recusal of the judge. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 1:15 pm
" Reavley cites Judge Barkett's dissenting opinion in Williams on this point. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 8:55 pm
Bowers v Hardwick? [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:28 am
Both Hardwicke Chambers and Halsbury’s Law Exchange published posts on the treaty and the issue of jurisdiction when offences for which individuals are extradited take place largely within the UK. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
Hardwick (1986), and he, like concurring Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, viewed the law as implicating sexual acts and sexuality-based identities (i.e., “homosexuals”), not as implicating sex- or gender-based identities. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
These behaviors by judges and quasi-judicial officers have always been problematic. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm
Judge Alsup made findings of fact that these were methods/systems, consistent w/9th Cir. law which has twice held that program interfaces that enable interoperability are unprotectable procedures under 102(b). [read post]
19 May 2011, 2:42 pm
Interest would run from November 2007 at the proposed rate of 2% to the trail judgment of 7 May 2009.Appeal allowed and the final order varied in these terms.Before I comment further, we should note the role of John de Waal of Hardwicke Chambers. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:24 am
Hardwick, when it narrowly conceptualized the issue as whether homosexuals have a right to engage in sodomy. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 11:50 am
Hardwick (1986), which broadly rejected any privacy protections for “homosexual sodomy. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 4:30 am
Hardwick, which had upheld a similar law. [read post]
