Search for: "Kaplan v. I. Kaplan, Inc." Results 101 - 120 of 135
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED, Appellee On Appeal from the 270th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2011-25539 O P I N I O N Schlumberger Technology Corporation and Baker Hughes Incorporated are in the midst of an arbitration proceeding to resolve patent disputes. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 10:54 am by Phil
The following is excerpted from a March 15, 2011 article by Chris Larus of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P. published at Inside Counsel: The Federal Circuit has increased its scrutiny of damage awards in patent infringement cases-a trend illustrated by its recent decision in Uniloc USA, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 9:21 am by Joshua Auriemma
BarBri is Up for Sale and Kaplan Can Smell Law Student Fear Internet Data Retention, The Body Takes on TSA, Barbri v.... [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
Before turning to the new development, and for the purpose of putting things in the proper perspective, I would like to quote at some length from Texaco’s appellate brief in Aguinda v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:59 am by Kevin LaCroix
First, on October 28, 2010, plaintiffs’ lawyers initiated a securities suit against The Washington Post Company and certain of its directors and offices, in connection with the companies Kaplan, Inc. education subsidiary. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
— San Antonio 2000, no pet.), while in Kendall Builders, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:23 pm
 The Legal Ethics Forum notes Bill Frievogel's excellent commentary on a decision just handed down denying a disqualification motion in: Silicon Graphics, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:04 am by Chris Carey
Kaplan, former president of G-V Capital Corp., which as a company pleaded guilty  to criminal fraud charges in 2004 in connection with a broader manipulation scheme by several brokerages, including Walsh Manning Securities Inc. and J.B. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 3:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Auth., 49 AD3d 478 [2008]), and the absence of a pattern of willful or contumacious conduct by plaintiff (see Kaplan v KCK Studios, 238 AD2d 264 [1997]), it was an improvident exercise of discretion for the motion court to dismiss the amended complaint with prejudice (see Grant v Rattoballi, 57 AD3d 272, 273 [2008]; Kaplan, 238 AD2d at 264-265; cf. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 3:29 am by Russ Bensing
  As the court notes in State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 3:29 am by Russ Bensing
  As the court notes in State v. [read post]