Search for: "Kaufman v. Court of Appeal"
Results 101 - 120
of 242
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2021, 4:05 am
In Kennedy v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:28 am
On March 30, 2020, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals issued a precedential en banc decision in Riccio v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
In the EEOC guidance on the issue, the EEOC cites Kaufman v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 8:24 pm
By Thomas Kaufman On February 4, 2013 in Espenscheid v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 3:30 am
The Ninth Circuit noted that in conformity with its findings, the third circuit in Kaufman v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 8:20 am
On May 31, 2022, the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, issued an opinion in the case of Savage v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 5:46 am
Kaufman v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 1:47 pm
Recent decisions in the Tax Court (Belk, Averyt) and the Courts of Appeals (Kaufman, Scheidelman) have turned on technical aspects of the Treasury regulations that govern the deductibility of these charitable contributions. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 5:12 am
The District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, upheld the trial judge's ruling allowing the expert to testify about consulting with other doctors. [read post]
15 May 2014, 5:29 am
If so, that’s called judicial vindictiveness and it was the issue in a recent appeal out of Kaufman County. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:10 pm
Now, today, we see the 7th Circuit couldn’t wait a couple months for the Supreme Court’s ruling in Christopher v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 3:58 am
The plaintiff appeals. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm
By Thomas Kaufman; (follow me on Twitter) Deleon v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 5:01 am
In the EEOC guidance on the issue, the EEOC cites Kaufman v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
” As the Commissioner's interpretation reads this nonexistent requirement into the provision, the Appellate Division said it viewed it as "an artificial or forced construction," Further, said the court, the Commissioner's interpretation “also runs contrary to the underlying purposes of the Rules governing teacher tenure and seniority credit,” citing the Court of Appeals' ruling in Kaufman v Fallsburg Cent. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:06 am
Costco appealed. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 3:59 pm
Kaufman were not confined to allegations in the court documents. [read post]
11 May 2018, 4:48 pm
JOHN TATUM AND MARY ANN TATUM; from Dallas County; 5th Court of Appeals District (05-14-01017-CV, 493 SW3d 646, 12-30-15) respondents' motion for sanctions denied The Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and renders judgment. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 8:05 am
Hempstead, 24 NY3d 96, 103; Matter of Wambold v Village of Southampton Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 140 AD3d 891, 892-893; Matter of Kaufman v Incorporated Vil. of Kings Point, 52 AD3d 604, 608). [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 4:31 am
The motion court correctly found that the complaint fails to state a cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation because plaintiff’s claimed losses resulted from defendants’ unauthorized withdrawal of her appeal and not from their purported false statements as to their [*2]ability to handle administrative proceedings (see Friedman v Anderson, 23 AD3d 163, 167 [1st Dept 2005]. [read post]
