Search for: "Kelly v. Smith" Results 101 - 120 of 283
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2017, 8:37 am by Doug Cornelius
Supreme Court’s definition of an “investment contract” in SEC v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
McKinney School of Law, Health Privacy Fragmentation Law, Medicine & Bioethics Session 1D – Room 345Thinking Differently About Surgical Law and EthicsModerator: Sylvia Caley, Georgia State University College of Law, “Extraordinary Measures: Special Considerations for the Unbefriended Patient”Kelly Dineen, Saint Louis University School of Law, Amending the Sunshine Act to Reflect Device Company Gifts to SurgeonsSamantha Johnson, Grady Health System, Extraordinary… [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 10:37 pm by Michael Nightingale
In his decision, Justice Bromberg found that the pre-employment negotiations with Ms Rakic were made “in trade or commerce”, citing with approval the decision of the Honourable Justice Kelly of the Federal Court in the matter of Walker v Salomon Smith Barney Securities Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 1099; (2003) 140 IR 433[2]. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 9:43 am by Ezra Rosser
Smith (1968) – Henry Freedman Legal Services Attorneys and Migrant Advocates Join Forces: Shapiro v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:33 am by Joy Waltemath
Clearly erroneous factual findings were made as to when the employee would have been released from jail and able to return to work before accumulating too many absences following an arrest that he disclosed during a deposition after he was fired (Smith v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 1:21 pm by Stewart Baker
Organizations whose hate speech has mainly been aimed at Smith v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 12:39 pm by Eugene Volokh
Begin, 753 F.3d 1, 9 (1st Cir. 2014) (holding that there can be a First Amendment right to film a police officer making a traffic stop), and Smith v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]