Search for: "Kent v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 779
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2008, 1:00 pm
The United States, of course, should live up to its treaty commitments. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:08 pm by Bexis
When the Levine, Riegel, and Kent cases were briefed in the United States Supreme Court, we provided our readers with “users’ guides”/”guided tours” that summarized the defense side arguments and pointed out whatever we thought was interesting.Today we’re continuing that tradition with the Bruesewitz (sooner or later we’ll memorize how to spell that) v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:35 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:22 am by Bill Otis
  The theory that brought about this result became an instant icon, of sorts, with the defense bar, and was even noted by Justice Scalia years later in the oral argument in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger notes that the “theme out of the United States Supreme Court [yesterday was] materiality. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 5:53 am by Conor McEvily
”  In an op-ed for the Christian Science Monitor Arjun Sethi discusses United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 10:03 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Front Pages   PDFArticle How the New Deal Became a Raw Deal for Indian Nations: Justice Stanley Reed and the Tee-Hit-Ton Decision on Indian Title – Kent McNeil   PDF Comments Keeping Cultural Bias Out of the Courtroom: How ICWA “Qualified Expert Witnesses” Make a Difference – Elizabeth Low   PDF Being Uighur . . . with “Chinese Characteristics”: Analyzing China’s Legal Crusade… [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am by Allison Trzop
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Will Baude covers United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether a guilty plea waives a defendant’s right to appeal the constitutionality of the law of conviction, and Jesner v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:13 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which it is considering the mens rea requirement for federal narcotics cases. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 4:08 am
United States, 208 U.S. 161 (1908)(striking down ban on "yellow-dog" contracts that forbade workers from joining trade unions.)Muller v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am by Amanda Rice
United States, the Don’t-Ask-Don’t-Tell case, reach the Supreme Court. [read post]