Search for: "LITTLE v. SUPERIOR COURT" Results 101 - 120 of 1,858
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2014, 9:57 am by Jeff Welty
The most difficult case for the court to harmonize is State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 11:56 am by Ronald Mann
Superior Court of California could hardly surprise anybody who noticed the court’s near-unanimous ruling last month in BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 1:52 pm by Greg May
Image via Wikipedia The Supreme Court denied review today in Burlage v. [read post]
10 May 2007, 1:29 pm
So I think that Justice Blease is correct to remand both of these cases, where it seems like the lower court has required the showing of a special mental deficiency as a prerequisite to any claim of incompetency. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 10:07 am by admin
February 16, 2013 Earlier this month, the Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in the Yellow Pages Marketing misleading advertising case (see: Competition Bureau v. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 6:17 am
The trial court granted B of A's motion for judgment on the pleadings, and the plaintiff appealed.The Court of Appeal held: (1) As held in McCoy v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 12:35 pm by Maurice W. McLaughlin
The Appellate Division of the Superior Court recently issued an opinion on New Jersey employment law discussing the nature of sexual harassment and when a tort claim notice must be served in the employment context. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:00 pm
Superior Court (2001) 94 Cal.App.4th 963, 973) and expressly limits its reach to convicted defendants, I concur in the result. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 6:36 am
Heidbreder challenged the city's decision in Lake Superior Court but lost.The decision is Heidbreder, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 9:35 am by Victoria Craig
From a parenting perspective, while the case of Douglas v Douglas, 2020 ONSC 2160 (which was heard on March 25, 2020, not long after the Superior Court of Justice and Ontario Court of Justice regular operations were initially suspended as a result of COVID-19) seemed to indicate that matters where one parent has reduced the other’s parenting time as a result of COVID-19 would not be considered urgent unless there was an existing court order, the… [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 8:30 am by Steven G. Pearl
As to substantive unconscionability, the Court found that the arbitration clause at issue was identical to the one at issue in Little v. [read post]