Search for: "Landers v. Landers"
Results 101 - 120
of 157
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2011, 5:36 am
Landers v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 12:11 am
*A recent case from the IP Enterprise Court has the answer - Frank Industries PTY Ltd v Nike Retail BV [2018] EWHC 1893 (Ch)Frank Industries owns a UK and an EU mark for LNDR in relation to “clothing” including “sportswear”. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:29 am
Reports come from Peter Landers at The Wall Street Journal (subscription required) and Chris Johnson at Washington Blade. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 10:03 am
In Shaw v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 7:09 am
In Holder v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
I begin with Renée Landers piece for a quite simple reason: More than any of the others, she emphasizes the costs that are attached to a free-wheeling policy of access to guns. [read post]
15 May 2010, 5:54 am
n10 Because of its power of individuation, DNA profiling is thesingle most powerful forensic tool of the 1990s.ANDState v Pennington, 327 NC 89, 393 SE2d 847, 853 (NC 1990) (The courtfocussed on reliability of the scientific method rather than its popularitywithin the scientific community); Caldwell v State, 260 Ga 278, 393 SE2d 436 (Ga1990). [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 9:00 pm
Methods v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 8:48 am
He’s been tinkering with computers since Lunar Lander on a mainframe teletype console was high tech. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:06 am
For example, in LSUC v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:05 pm
There were Powell v Birmingham Mail (Clause 1), Landers v Darlington and Stockton Times (Clause 1), Dobson v Sun (Clause 1), Fellows v Sunday Mercury (Clauses 1 and 5), Choudry v Daily Mail (Clause 1), Buchan v Daily Mail (Clause 1), Rape Crisis v Daily Mail (Clause 1), Brown v Lincolnshire Echo (Clauses 3 and 5), Cousins v Times (Clause 1). [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 11:03 am
The plaintiffs argued that Romer v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 11:09 am
In the first paper, Professor Amy Landers of McGeorge demonstrated that the history of the Patent Act supported apportionment based on the novel contribution of the patentee over the prior art. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
In Howes v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 4:16 am
Jeg var på stranden for en uke siden, og da jeg lander på balkongen min, ser jeg ofte noen barn som bygger et bestemt sandslott i nærheten av vann. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:32 pm
X, § 9)), quoted in Landers v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 6:23 am
” Landers v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:05 am
The Betz v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm
The conjoined quantum appeals in KC v MGN and Cairns v Modi have been listed in the Court of Appeal for 26 and 27 July 2012. [read post]
