Search for: "Latham v. Latham"
Results 101 - 120
of 337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2021, 5:14 am
Rebekka holds a PhD in Theoretical Physics from the Bonn University.Sven Völcker (Partner, Latham & Watkins):Dr Sven Völcker is a partner in Latham & Watkins' Global Antitrust & Competition Practice. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 11:56 am
Garre, now chair of the appellate practice at Latham & Watkins, in Washington. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:02 am
Jeffrey Clark (1:23-cv-03721) (civil removal proceedings) GA (Latham): The State of Georgia v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 5:29 am
Latham, 2012 U.S. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 6:57 am
Koh's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and remedial ordersJay Jurata (Partner, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe)Licensing practitioner's perspective on fallout from FTC v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 3:31 pm
Latham, No. 06-CR-379, 2007 WL 4563459, at *4 (D. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 11:06 am
" (Parenthetically: Latham, which represented the appellees, should know better than to make this basic mistake -- a mistake that likely cost the City a monetary benefit that it can ill-afford to lose. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 3:03 pm
Latham & Watkins (2017) 3 Cal.5th 767, 775 (Parrish).) [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Dubofsky, Latham & Watkins LLP, on Thursday, February 29, 2024 Editor's Note: Tiffany F. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Dubofsky, Latham & Watkins LLP, on Thursday, February 29, 2024 Editor's Note: Tiffany F. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 6:58 am
Roman Martinez (Latham Watkins) is set to argue for Warhol and Lisa Blatt (Williams Connolly) for Goldsmith. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 3:50 am
In any event, whether plaintiff can ultimately prevail on these allegations is not relevant on this pre-answer motion to dismiss (see Endless Ocean, LLC v Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, 113 AD3d 587, 589 [2d Dept 2014]). [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 2:43 pm
PatLit announces a talk next Tuesday by Latham & Watkins' Don McCombie on what Europe's new patent regime means for junior practitioners, this talk for IPSoc has been arranged on the back of Don's Brave New World series of posts for that weblog. [read post]
6 May 2013, 1:20 pm
Lukasz first reviewed the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruling in Case C-235/09 DHL v Chronopost, on the extent to which injunctive relief, granted in the court of one EU Member States, should or must extend to the entire extent of the EU? [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:16 am
In Kelley v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 3:40 pm
The case, Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 9:00 am
Cleary Gottlieb v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:43 pm
” At the Volokh Conspiracy, Jonathan Adler discusses Texas’s decision to retain Latham & Watkins in the case. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 9:39 am
P. 37(c)(1), Chief Magistrate Patricia V. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 3:58 am
(See CPLR §3211 [a][l]; see also Morgenthow & Latham v Bank of N. [read post]
