Search for: "Layman v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 173
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2016, 6:38 am
This is one of those cases that seems to be an extreme outlier, but then again see United We Stand America v. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 8:13 am
Miri, who like many readers is an IP enthusiast but not a patent specialist, reflects the concerns of many people who find themselves floating in that strange position of being somewhere between a layman and an expert. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 10:19 pm
See Hunter v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:16 am
Noonan v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 6:30 am
All state laws vary. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:16 am
Noonan v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 1:42 pm
The Arizona Supreme Court ruling in Arizona v. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 7:56 am
Supreme Court in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 3:35 am
In State v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 5:45 pm
As Justice White explained in a separate opinion in United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 9:11 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
United States, 991 F.2d 300, 304 (6th Cir. 1993); Kugel v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
So, in 2009, in Ashcroft v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 12:47 pm
This got short shrift from the judge who quoted the Hoffman v Dare judgment. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 8:54 am
Another example can be found in the dissenting opinion of Balla v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:55 am
State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 9:07 am
This week the US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit upheld a District Court’s judgment in a New York case, Saladino v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 6:47 pm
GmbH v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:17 am
” Online Policy Grp. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 11:36 am
In layman's terms this means that you would not call a nappy a 'baby dry' and as such the term Baby Dry is not as a whole descriptive of nappies. [read post]
