Search for: "Leahy v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 354
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2018, 3:00 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States Postal Service 17-1594 Issues: (1) Whether the government is a “person” who may petition to institute review proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act; and (2) whether an action under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
1 May 2018, 4:37 am by Christopher J. Walker
Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for the Court in in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:47 pm by Ronald Mann
This morning brought decisions in both of the patent cases argued in November, with the government prevailing on the constitutional question raised in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 1:31 pm by Gregory Sephton
  The new law no longer requires an invalidating sale to be in the United States – now it can be anywhere. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 10:23 am by Beth Graham
On Monday, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 11:28 am by Rachel Sandler
Today’s en banc decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Aqua Products, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
Third party challengers can seemingly inflict stock-price drop through an efficient patent invalidation mechanism provided at the United States Patent and Trademark Office, while betting against the targeted company’s stock price. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:51 am by Gene Quinn
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently issued a major decision interpreting provisions of the America Invents Act (AIA), specifically the AIA on-sale bar provisions. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 12:41 pm by Quinta Jurecic, Matthew Kahn
The United States’ withdrawal will take up to four years to complete under the terms of the accord. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 12:26 am by Dennis Crouch
 Note here that the argument is not based upon a statute codified in the United States Code since it is only a temporary provision that will sunset after three more years. [read post]