Search for: "Lester v. Powers" Results 101 - 120 of 127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2010, 1:13 am by INFORRM
We know from cases such as Mosley, McKennit v Ash and Naomi Campell that it covers the publication of information that is obviously private, such as that pertaining to health, medical treatment, sexual life, private finance and family life. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm by INFORRM
The new voluntary body would be independent of both government and media but with strong powers over members. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm by David Kris
Trump had refused to criticize Russia on the campaign trail, praising President Vladimir V. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:09 am by INFORRM
As mentioned in our earlier post, the Government has today launched its Consultation on a new draft “Defamation Bill”, following on Lord Lester’s 2010 private member’s version. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In England, discussion has been dominated by the House of Commons report [1] and Lord Lester’s law reform bill [2]. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-6856 Issue: Whether the “separate sovereign” concept actually exists when Congress’s plenary power over Indian tribes and the general erosion of any real tribal sovereignty is amplified by the Northern Cheyenne Tribe’s constitution in such a way that the petitioner’s prosecutions in both tribal and federal court violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 10:21 am by Schachtman
Litigation-related research has been the punching bag of self-appointed public health advocates for some time. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am by Schachtman
The complaint also contained a number of allegations to the effect that the defendant law firms had “used their considerable resources and power in an attempt to intimidate and deter GAF (and others) from exercising their constitutionally protected rights to petition Congress in support of legislation that would establish a fair and efficient administrative facility for resolving legitimate asbestos claims without the years of delay and wasteful fees and transaction costs that are… [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:40 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/yRWkxa (Henry Kelston) How to Create an eDiscovery Team – An Interview with HB Gordan from Teva Pharmaceuticals – bit.ly/xCM6yj (Amber Scorah) How to Reduce Medical Malpractice eDiscovery Issues and Costs - bit.ly/ylZmA5 (Matthew Keris) Innovation and Informed Risk-Taking are an eDiscovery Duty - bit.ly/zKtiDm (Chris Dale) Lester v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
It is well established that the exemption applies both before and after publication (see Campbell v MGN [2003] QB 633). [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
This was summarised during questions to the Home Office minister in the House of Lords in 2003:Lord Lester of Herne Hill asked her Majesty's Government: Whether denying prisoners the right to vote affects their ability to persuade Ministers of the Crown and those responsible for the Prison Service to improve the conditions in which they are imprisoned; and whether denying prisoners the right to vote amounts to an additional punishment; and whether this is compatible with Article 25 of… [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
We also believe that incumbent directors should not have an effective monopoly power to set the corporate arrangements governing their own election, and that it is therefore desirable to facilitate shareholders' ability to amend - within the limits set by state and federal law - corporate arrangements governing the nomination and election of directors. [read post]