Search for: "Lewis v. Gross" Results 101 - 120 of 139
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by INFORRM
We mentioned his blog post about Lewis in last week’s round-up. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:55 pm by familoo
  In Hope (aka Lewis, Formerly Krejci) v Krejci & Ors [2012] EWHC 1780 (Fam) (29 June 2012) Mostyn J, having previously dealt with applications for financial remedy, dealt with subsequent applications by the wife, where his orders in her favour had effectively been frustrated. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
On 19 December 2011, the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls, Etherton and Gross LJJ) gave judgment in the case of Hutcheson v Popdog Limited ([2011] EWCA Civ 1580) which was heard on 7 December 2011. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:19 am by Kate Howard
Lewis 16-285 Issue: Whether an agreement that requires an employer and an employee to resolve employment-related disputes through individual arbitration, and waive class and collective proceedings, is enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act, notwithstanding the provisions of the National Labor Relations Act. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
Over in the States, London-based solicitor Mark Lewis is working with Norman Siegel of Siegel Teitelbaum & Evans LLP and Steven Hyman of McLaughlin & Stern LLP to look into allegations of phone hacking in the US. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
A Musical Experience + Helmut Lang + Henna by Senya + House of Leifer + J&J Snack Foods Corporation + J and V Audio Inc. + JAKKS Pacific, Inc. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 10:26 pm
The name refers to the 1971 Supreme Court case of Bivens v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 5:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
But had we not had Lewis Carroll, we would never have gotten Alice in Wonderland. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:00 am by Tim Eavenson
Both noted that the Supreme Court was about to weigh in on the Ledbetter Act for the first time in Lewis v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:09 am by Peter Mahler
 In the seminal Delaware case, Aronson v Lewis, 473 A.2d 405 [1984], the Supreme Court held that plaintiffs in derivative actions must allege particularized facts which create a “reasonable doubt” that, (1) the directors are disinterested and independent and (2) the challenged transaction was otherwise the product of a valid exercise of business judgment. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]