Search for: "Lexmark"
Results 101 - 120
of 688
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2017, 7:21 pm
Lexmark International, Inc. and TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 9:12 pm
The Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO) will offer a one-hour webinar entitled "Exhaustion Unleashed: Licensing, Other Business Strategy, and Litigation after Lexmark" on June 28, 2017 from 2:00 to 3:00 pm (ET). [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 9:09 pm
During its romp through standing doctrine, last year’s unanimous Supreme Court decision in Lexmark had something to say about the rule against generalized grievances. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 5:39 am
Lexmark Int’l v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 9:05 am
In addition to selling new Lexmark-branded toner cartridges, it refurbishes used Lexmark cartridges. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 11:18 am
The transcript in Lexmark International Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 1:45 pm
The court thus dismissed theinfringement claim regarding Impression’s actions involvingReturn Program cartridges Lexmark had sold in theUnited States. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:27 am
Lexmark International, Inc., 2017 U.S. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:27 am
Lexmark International, Inc., 2017 U.S. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:06 am
Lexmark holds patents in relation to these cartridges, and most of the cartridges had strict single-use/resale restrictions set by Lexmark both in the US and abroad. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:22 am
As a result, Impression Products was not liable for patent infringement when it bought used Lexmark toner cartridges abroad from lawful purchasers, refilled them, and then imported and sold them in the United States, nor did the post-sale restrictions Lexmark placed on its goods give rise to patent infringement liability. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 8:51 am
Has been filed. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 9:35 am
Against that backdrop, Lexmark’s argument is straightforward. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 10:37 am
The Court’s consideration of LexMark International, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 3:17 pm
TechDirt is reporting that Hewlett-Packard (HP) and Lexmark have asked the International Trade Commission (ITC) to block import of certain ink that allegedly infringes on several of its patents. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 11:17 am
Lexmark International, Inc. is here. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:10 am
The opinion in Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 9:08 am
But Lexmark teaches that direct sales diversion isn’t the only cognizable injury. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 6:24 am
” Lexmark, 137 S. [read post]
1 May 2014, 6:59 am
As for the Lanham Act, Lexmark changed the ground rules. [read post]
