Search for: "Little v. Smith*" Results 101 - 120 of 2,296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2009, 4:36 am
Today, SCOTUS handed down the much-anticipated opinion in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 4:40 am by INFORRM
But it is perhaps a mistake to read across and interpret para 6 of the Code, which relates to children as school pupils and as the subject of interviews, the provision at para 6(v) that ‘editors must not use the fame, notoriety or position the parent or guardian as sole justification for publishing details of a child’s private life’ or para 7, relating to children as victims or witnesses in sex cases, in this way in this case. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:27 am by Law Office of D. Hardison Wood
” That little wrinkle is what is called the “billed v. paid” or “quoted price v. incurred amount” provision in SB 33. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 8:11 pm by cdw
[update] First sunny non-cold set of days in weeks, a little too much frolic, a little too little writing;  the weekly will (hopefully) run tomorrow. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:57 pm by Paul Ohm
E.g., Smith, 442 U.S., at 742; United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:22 pm by Will Baude
  So one frequently-used example comes from the Supreme Court's opinion in Coyle v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 2:49 pm
  And, as if that wasn't enough, the Ninth Circuit's opinion drops this little nugget in a footnote on page seven:  "Hours after murdering Officer Martin, Martinez robbed a convenience store in Blythe, California, and fatally shot the store clerk. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:25 pm
It's a FEHA case, and plaintiff obtains a judgment at trial for a little over $130,000. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
S. ___, 141 S.Ct. 1220 (2021); see, Bernard Bell, A Little Blue Birdie Told Me: Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 3:39 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Co-authored by Jessica Schauer and Richard Alfred The past two weeks have brought a number of important updates for those watching the Christopher v. [read post]