Search for: "Long v. Secretary, Department of Corrections" Results 101 - 120 of 388
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2020, 2:32 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the Sept. 29 and Oct. 9 conferences) Rogers County Board of Tax Roll Corrections v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm
They may also wish to consider the impact of the differing institutions in which lawyers work and address business and human rights issues, such as outside law firms, in house counsel departments, governments, and civil society, among others. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:52 pm by Ben Berwick, Rachel Homer
Wolf’s tenure—and that of several of the other highest-ranking officials within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), such as Ken Cuccinelli, whose laughable title is “Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of U.S. [read post]
Equally significant this election cycle is changing rules and ongoing litigation about how long voters will have to correct mail ballots rejected due to missing signatures on their return ballot envelope. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Benjamin EidelsonThis post offers preliminary analysis of DHS v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 7:56 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The Supreme Court issued only one decision today, but it was another big one: Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 7:38 am by Cyberleagle
Since this is a long read, here is a list of the selected topics:Will Parliament or the regulator decide what “harm” means? [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 3:04 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch Arthrex, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
Somewhat ironically, the long-standing, bipartisan position of the Justice Department has been that the courts do not have the authority to resolve such disputes. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:12 pm by Ben Berwick, Justin Florence
This claim is contradicted by a wide range of authoritative legal sources—and were it correct, would lead to absurd consequences. [read post]