Search for: "Low v. DISTRICT COURT, ETC."
Results 101 - 120
of 310
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2023, 4:30 am
Second, pursuant to the Supreme Court's holding in Mesa v. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 7:59 pm
Nonetheless, the requirement of plausibility is still a “very low” threshold and different to the requirement of “fair expectation of success” in the inventive step inquiry - citing Actavis v Lilly[2015]. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 6:15 pm
Smucker Co., Northern District of California; Paschoal v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 12:31 am
So could the government obtain a warrant to conduct a colonoscopy, etc., to find drugs believed to be inside the person? [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 2:00 pm
In Briseno v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 3:25 pm
Marin Municipal Water Dist., etc. (1st Dist. 2013) 216 Cal.App.4th 614; Save Panoche Valley v. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 2:18 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia, Index No. 1:06 Cr 00079, Mr. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 5:13 am
Many roads lead to Rome, i.e., API freedom.The Oracle v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 2:34 pm
” Id. at *4.Of Note: AFPD Young lost her creative challenge to the expansive power of the district court to order restitution, but also brought this novel issue: For substantive offenses (not conspiracies, etc.), is the district court statutorily authorized to impose restitution beyond the offense of conviction? [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:03 pm
For example, in Brannum v. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 11:07 am
The enquiries required to be made were those that were necessary fairly to make a decision as to the suitability of the property, Codona v Mid-Bedfordshire District Council (2005) EWCA Civ 925. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 3:15 pm
See, e.g., Renton v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm
Additional confidence levels are then constructed exhibiting the range at other confidence levels, e.g., at 90%, 80%, etc. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 8:31 am
There is a horrific split among district courts throughout the 9th Circuit. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
Pasadena Unified School District v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 11:52 am
That’s what Golan v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 6:57 am
The appeals court also upheld the district court’s issuance of sanctions against the plaintiff’s attorney, finding no abuse of discretion its imposition of sanctions against the attorney for issuing unauthorized subpoenas. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 6:57 pm
Supreme Court in February 2013 was unsuccessful.) [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:42 pm
A company’s outside counsel was acting as an attorney-agent when doing a background investigation and therefore did not qualify as a reporting agency under the FCRA, ruled a federal court in the District of Columbia (Mattiaccio v G, II v DHA Group, Inc). [read post]
