Search for: "MATTER OF V R B"
Results 101 - 120
of 8,825
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2012, 3:35 am
” * A group of school district retirees also commenced a CPLR Article 78 proceeding to annul the district's decision to discontinue Medicare Part B premium reimbursements (Matter of Bryant v Board of Educ., Chenango Forks Cent. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:00 am
R (Lumsdon & Ors) v Legal Services Board [2015] UKSC 41, 24 June 2015 (see judgment). [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 11:12 am
The case of R. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:58 pm
” Jervis B. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 1:07 pm
Fed R Crim P 35(b) allows a sentence reduction. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:01 pm
See Filippone v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 7:31 am
In Rizzo v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:40 am
It furthermore held that the authorities of the committees relied upon by the appellants was “slight” as a matter of international law, relying on Jones v Ministry of Interior of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [2007] 1 AC 270 at [23]. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 9:41 pm
., sued Aliphcom (d/b/a Jawbone) for infringement of U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 8:36 pm
District Court for the Central District of California issued an order granting a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) for lack of patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
24 May 2017, 4:32 am
V. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 3:19 am
R. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 12:00 am
Does she talk as if she has experience with this type of matter? [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 7:04 am
R. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 7:57 pm
Flesky moved to dismiss the case under Rule 12(b)(6), on the grounds that the asserted claims lacked subject matter eligibility. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 5:00 am
In the case of Diaz-Martinez v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:32 am
In this post, James Warshaw, an associate in the Dispute Resolution team at CMS, previews the decision which is expected to be handed down tomorrow, 1 July 2020, in the matter of R v Hilton (Northern Ireland). [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 6:09 am
If you are considering a Rule 54(b) appeal, a good case at bar is Bell Microproducts, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 1:54 am
This is why The 1709 Blog has decided to launch a poll asking its enthusiastic readers to answer the following question:DO YOU THINK THAT CLOSED SUBJECT-MATTER SYSTEMS ARE NO LONGER ACCEPTABLE UNDER EU COPYRIGHT? [read post]
