Search for: "Manufacturing Company v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 3,110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2011, 6:10 pm by IP Dragon
However, "[b]ecause Defendant PRC's wrongful acts alleged herein arise in connection with a commercial activity that causes a direct effect in the United Stated, Defendant PRC comes within an express exception to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, viz, 28 U.S.C. section 1605 (a)(2):(a) A foreign state shall not be immune from the jurisdiction of courts of the United States or of the States in any case - (1) in which the foreign… [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 11:06 am
The United Supreme Court on Wednesday, in a 6-3 ruling, held that a drug company is not protected from state law claims simply because the federal government approved the product and its labeling. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:37 pm by Daniel Nazer
This will disadvantage companies that do research and development in the United States. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 2:46 pm by Schachtman
Kesselheim focused primarily on the Second Circuit’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:20 am
State Law would have required the generic drug companies to warn of this known risk. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 4:44 pm by Eddy Salcedo
Expanding what until recently had been very limited options for U.S. companies to enforce their rights against Chinese companies misappropriating trade secrets, the Federal Circuit in TianRui Group Co. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 4:03 am
Shareholders of Perrigo Company recently filed suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Perrigo, a pharmaceutical manufacturer and distributor and seven of its directors and officers, alleging violations of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the 1934 Securities Exchange Act. [read post]
20 May 2022, 7:35 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
An employee who was wrongfully dismissed has won their motion to interview the company’s president as part of their case Nezhat-Mahal v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 7:35 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
An employee who was wrongfully dismissed has won their motion to interview the company’s president as part of their case Nezhat-Mahal v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 9:31 am by Anthony B. Cavender
Lockheed Martin Corporation, one of the largest defense contractors in the United States, operated three California facilities that manufactured solid-propellant rockets for the United States Department of Defense pursuant to contracts subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulations. [read post]