Search for: "Mark Coats"
Results 101 - 120
of 903
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2010, 11:23 am
Trademark Registration No. 1,370,465) for a “wax-like coating covering the cap of the bottle and trickling down the side of the neck of the bottle in a freeform irregular pattern. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 3:09 am
for "detective agency services" in view of the registered marks JUST CALL – WE DO IT ALL! [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 2:46 am
" Applicant contended that the additional wording and the design element in its mark sufficed to distinguish it from the cited mark.]In re La Mamba, LLC, Serial No. 87791970 (December 4, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Lorelei Ritchie) [Section 2(d) refusal of PARC & LEX (and design) for "Clothing, namely, t-shirts, sweatshirts, skirts, pants, jeans, coats, dresses, underwear, tops and bottoms; headwear; footwear," in light of the registered… [read post]
12 May 2015, 5:36 am
[Refusal to register SHINE 'N' SHIELD for "clear coating protectant for vehicles" and for "car wash services," in view of the registered mark SHINE & SHIELD for "Automobile and car wax preparations; Automobile cleaners; Automobile polishes; Automobile tire cleaning and polishing preparations; Automobile wax; Automobile, tire, glass and wheel cleaning preparations; Cleaning, washing and polishing preparations; Polymer sealant for cleaning,… [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 3:39 am
The PTO refused registration of the mark I BANGED BETTY for "bathing suits for men; men’s and women’s jackets, coats, trousers, vests; men’s underwear," deeming it to be scandalous or immoral under Section 2(a). [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 4:18 am
And the certification mark TEQUILA cleared the opposition hurdle.Section 2(a) - Deceptiveness:Precedential No. 8: TTAB Finds KLEER ADHESIVES Deceptive, But Not KLEER MOULDINGS and KLEER TRIMBOARDSection 2(b) - Flag, Coat of Arms, or Other Insignia:Precedential No. 7: TTAB Affirms Section 2(b) Refusal of Mark Simulating the Prince of Wales EmblemPrecedential No. 3 = TTAB Test: Does this Mark Include a Simulation of the Swiss Flag? [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 4:27 am
The General Court said it was "highly likely that the contested mark rode on the coat-tails of the McDONALD'S trade mark. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 3:11 am
., Serial No. 87865135 [Section 2(d) refusal of SIMONIZ CERAMICSHIELD for "Paint sealant for exterior surfaces of vehicle" in view of the registered mark PLATINUM CERAMIC SHIELD for "“Clear coating protectant containingceramic nanoparticles for use on vehicles" [CERAMIC disclaimed].October 20, 2020 - 11 AM: In re Carolyn Anderson Beautiful, LLC, Serial No. 87851445 [Section 2(d) refusal of the mark BEAUTIFUL (stylized) for various hair care… [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 8:02 am
The mark was filed as a series of 2. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 10:33 am
First, it held that the classification of a mark as figurative was not able to exclude the application of the technical function test, with which all trade marks must comply. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 3:45 pm
Prusa, Die Another Day: Zeroing in on Targeted Dumping – Did the AB Hit the Mark in US–Washing Machines? [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
Older wolfThat said, this time, the General Court had to consider the applicant’s claim that its CTM application could not cause any free-riding of the Elmar Wolf’s earlier marks either.The Court said that taking unfair advantage of the distinctive character or the reputation of an earlier mark means free-riding on the coat-tails of the mark or trying to exploit its reputation: there must be a risk that the aura of the mark, or the… [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 6:36 pm
Blue Coat, represented by Mark Lemley, prevailed on the'968 patent matter.From the decision:Blue Coat also argues that it was entitled to JMOL ofnon-infringement with respect to the ’968 patent becauseFinjan failed to introduce substantial evidence that theaccused products implement the claimed “policy index. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 3:30 am
SolarWindow asserted that consumers may be confused as to whether the term POWERCOATINGS refers to a type of protective coating or finish applied to the product, or a method for applying the coating, or whether the term is a misspelling of the term "powder coating. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 1:10 am
Referring to the ECJ's decision in L'Oreal v Bellure, the OGH took the view that Mr Mandl had attempted "to ride on the coat-tails of that mark in order to benefit from its power of attraction, its reputation and its prestige, and to exploit, without paying any financial compensation" and had unfairly taken advantage of the distinctive character or the repute of that mark. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 3:48 am
Applicant McClane maintained that "sof" is not the phonetic equivalent of "soft," distinguishing its mark from the marks involved in the cases cited by the Examining Attorney. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 4:40 am
[Section 2(d) opposition to registration of OAKLIEN & Design for “jewelry pins for use on hats” and for “hats; shirts; jogging pants; men’s and women’s jackets, coats, trousers, vests; sweat shirts,” in view of the registered mark OAKLEY for sunglasses, clothing, and watches.] [read post]
18 May 2012, 12:54 pm
Haas of Coats & Bennett Thomas W. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 5:06 am
Sean Kelly, Cancellation No. 92063940 [Petition for cancellation of a registration for the mark VELOCETTE for "Coats; Jackets; Shirts; T-shirts; Tops," on the ground of likelihood of confusion with the identical common law mark used, under license, in connection with various clothing items.]January 12, 2022 - 2 PM: In re Alembic Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Serial No. 88660548 [Section 2(d) refusal of ALEMBIC for "Generic prescription drugs, approved by the U.S. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 3:26 am
[Refusal to register CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE for coatings, namely, non-aerosol interior and exterior paints, in view of the registered mark CONTRACTOR for protective and decorative coatings in the nature of aerosol paint].In re Riotto, Serial No. 85144408 (October 9, 2012) [not precedential]. [read post]
