Search for: "Mark Harms"
Results 101 - 120
of 10,251
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2011, 8:31 am
” (internal quotation marks omitted)). [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 1:08 pm
Mark your calendar, submit a proposal, and forward this message to blogs, list serves, and people who might be interested. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 12:59 pm
But frivolousness focuses on “what a litigant could reasonably believe would constitute sufficient evidence to allow a reasonable inference of harm caused by the false marking. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 11:12 am
Nor does the city demonstrate that delaying a search would result in ‘injury or ongoing harm to the community. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 5:47 am
For the first time, I am publishing details of multiple requests for condolence payments that the Pentagon denied in 2021 – despite being deemed credible – which illustrate how broken current processes are and how urgently they need to change. *** This November marked the six-year anniversary of the U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:00 am
Brain Ellefsen owned SMBJ and his brother, Mark, was the corporation’s business manager. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 4:06 pm
(2) What kinds of harm are in scope? [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 12:40 pm
The 15 individuals are: Daniel Broyles Michael Duke Richard Bohnsack Charles Davis Joel Duncan Mark Parman Paula Saccomanno William Roth Billy Ray Statham, Jr. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 4:53 pm
If this was meant to be greeted as good news then it may well miss the mark. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:34 am
” The TTAB further held that Coca-Cola was injured because Coca-Cola “reasonably believe[d] in damage proximately caused by the continued registration by [Meenaxi] of THUMS UP and LIMCA” as Meenaxi’s use of the THUMS UP and LIMCA marks could cause a harm “stemming from the upset expectations of consumers. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:34 am
” The TTAB further held that Coca-Cola was injured because Coca-Cola “reasonably believe[d] in damage proximately caused by the continued registration by [Meenaxi] of THUMS UP and LIMCA” as Meenaxi’s use of the THUMS UP and LIMCA marks could cause a harm “stemming from the upset expectations of consumers. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:00 am
Judge Mark noted that those decisions came to such a finding on the basis of recurring events or conditions that had caused harm to invitees in the past in an obvious fashion. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 5:30 am
In a dilution claim, a trademark owner asserts that their famous mark is entitled to protection from use that causes harm to the mark’s reputation or distinctiveness. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 10:58 am
Speculative allegations of harm are insufficient for Lanham Act standing. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:41 am
Mark Bennett, before the Georgia Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 4:06 pm
Mark Zuckerberg in his evidence to the US Congress has said he welcomes regulation of the right sort and Jack Dorsey of Twitter has made a public plea for ideas. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 10:26 am
A Video FAQ with Mark A. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 12:44 pm
“The Silver Lining of the Supreme Court’s Next Harmful Religious Liberty Ruling; A terrible precedent denies workers of faith their rights; But its replacement could be worse”: Mark Joseph Stern has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:55 am
” test to determine that the marks were suggestive. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 6:52 am
Sukumar argued that the false marking was widespread and harmed consumers by causing them to pay more than the machines were worth. [read post]
