Search for: "Marks v. Howe"
Results 101 - 120
of 14,157
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2019, 3:28 pm
KDAA v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:59 am
In doing so, the Supreme Court rejected the result of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Person's Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 12:28 am
But how to use this function in trade mark cases may need to be explored. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 4:43 am
However, how far does a service provider have to go to ensure that they are not falling foul of trade mark law? [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 3:07 am
Cars for Kids v. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 2:46 am
These questions were recently answered in a ruling by the CJEU in the Globus v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 2:15 am
The fame of the POST-IT mark was the dominant factor, with the Board rejecting applicant's principal argument that the marks are not confusingly similar. 3M Company v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 10:49 am
Accordingly, if the words in question had no independent distinctive role, their acronym presumably couldn't have one either.Secondly, wondered the Court, how did Strigl and Securvita apply here, this being a case involving the absolute grounds for refusal of lack of distinctiveness and descriptive character of a mark, not the likelihood of confusion. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 1:21 pm
To learn more about Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig and how we assist you, contact us by calling 800-747-9354 or emailing clientservices@dbllawyers.com. [1] The Boeing Co. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 10:01 am
Circuit’s decision in ACA International v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:08 am
It is also difficult to see how the act of affixing a sign in itself affects or is liable to affect a trade mark function or constitutes communication to the public (as required for the concept of 'use'). [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
The book features eleven opinions by legal scholars explaining how they would have written Roe v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 11:03 am
See Quality Inns Intern., Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2024, 9:56 am
Board’: Friday marks the 70th anniversary of the landmark Supreme Court decision ‘Brown v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:13 am
Marks v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 8:46 am
How is it ascertained though that someone is a specialist? [read post]
14 May 2024, 4:34 pm
” appeared first on How Appealing. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:22 pm
He emphasised how valuable trade marks are and referred, by way of example, to the trade mark GOOGLE which represents 27% of the company’s overall value.Given the fact that the aim of plain packaging legislation is to discourage the use of tobacco products , Dr Dean stated that it defies comprehension how destroying an item of property, namely a trade mark, could be brought into relation with the discouraging of smoking. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 4:40 am
Oakley, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 11:20 am
The post How to Tell if a Trademark is Considered Infringing appeared first on Rubric Legal LLC. [read post]
