Search for: "Marriage of Brown"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,604
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2015, 6:54 pm
We are here to service every person, whether they be straight or gay, brown or black. [read post]
31 May 2010, 8:55 pm
According to the Brown University Population and Training Center, a marriage preceded by cohabitation has a better chance of success when the couple became officially engaged prior to moving in together. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 1:13 pm
Schwarzenegger/Brown trial under seal. [read post]
22 May 2012, 9:11 am
Same-sex marriage is only legally recognized in a few states. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 4:00 pm
“Husband” and “wife” have been deleted from California’s marriage law under a bill signed into law Monday by Governor Jerry Brown. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:01 pm
Brown was "dishonest and foolish. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:30 am
Brown v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 5:56 am
Brown, 8 Vet. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 4:18 pm
Brown is that it is dishonest and foolish. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 8:21 am
How many of you see this headline--Alabama judge: Marriage ruling worse than segregation decision--and thought Roy Moore was talking about Brown? [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 10:45 am
Cockrum, an attorney with Frost Brown Todd LLC in Louisville, Kentucky, said that although the full 6th Circuit might review the ruling, the current split among the circuits may give the Supreme Court justices a ruling they’re eager to review. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 12:30 am
First: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia has announced that because of "private reasons long ago" he will not participate in the court's historic decision on the Defense of Marriage Act and gay marriage cases argued before the court last week. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 11:44 am
Attorney General Brown opined over the summer that such an amendment would have only prospective operation to bar new marriages, but I never heard any reasoned explanation of that position. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Just as, in our era, prospective Supreme Court Justices must explain how their judicial philosophy approves of the 1954 Brown v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:30 pm
Brown agrees on this point. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 1:13 am
In that case, opponents are asking a court to strike most of the proponents' arguments, citing "false and misleading" comments, including the assertion that "teachers will be required to teach young children there is no difference between gay marriage and traditional marriage" unless Prop. 8 passes. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 8:09 am
He pointed out that the definition of marriage had prevailed for millennia and it seemed a fast change; on the other hand, he noted that the time between Lawrence and this case was about equal to the time between Brown and Loving -- this raised the question for him of whether this might all be too fast to redefine such a long standing institution. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 2:47 pm
Brown, 2009 UT App. 315, (Utah Court of Appeals, October 29, 2009).Common Law Marriage. [read post]
