Search for: "Matter of Adoption of David C."
Results 101 - 120
of 721
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
This fact makes Section 2(c) different than the viewpoint-discriminatory provisions in Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act at issue in Tam and Brunetti that banned registration of subject matter that may be disparaging, immoral, or scandalous. [read post]
30 May 2009, 5:48 pm
David Kirkpatrick of the NYTimes writes one of the more remarkable (in a bad way) articles yet on Judge Sonia Sotomayor. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:25 am
Lemley: Other IP cases from the Court: tried very hard not to adopt a test, just to say that there are factors to consider in each case. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:58 am
Adopt “interactive” theory of fame. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:01 pm
But leniency is typically a matter of discretion, rather than the kind of strict following of rules that content-neutrality seems to require. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
(c) Evelyn GathingsMerpel's new fashion dress! [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:11 am
The jurisprudence of the ECtHR, of which this court must always take account and which in my view it should in this instance adopt, is no more than that i [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
Kevin C. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 10:18 am
Maatman, Jr. and David Ross Virtually every class action pending in federal court has undergone a re-examination based on the U.S. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
The plaintiffs in Raines claimed that giving the President such authority diluted the power of Congress, because any votes on subsequent budget bills in Congress might not be given full effect by a President who decided to spend on some, but not on all, the budget items Congress had adopted. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 5:57 am
Evidence from the Stock Option Backdating Scandal Posted by Dain C. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 9:10 am
by David Hricik Over on the main page, Dennis has done a good job laying out the court’s “analysis” in Versata v. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 7:56 am
” The question in the case is, rather, “how does what the state did here relate to (a) the authority of parents over their children, (b) the power of the state to protect the well-being of children, and (c) the constitutional protection for ‘the freedom of speech’? [read post]
Guest Post: Response of Arbitral Institutions to the COVID-19 Crisis– An Indian Perspective: Part II
21 Aug 2020, 6:11 pm
However, the measures adopted by Arbitral Institutions are ambitious. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 8:35 am
(David Post) As I’ve noted before on a number of occasions, a possible landmark copyright case is now before the 2d Circuit, Viacom et al. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
”This article draws on two excellent books: James C. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
Is this hypothetical figure somehow evolving, David asks? [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 11:28 am
(David J. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 10:06 am
DAVID JOHNSON V. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 6:14 pm
See Ex parte David Walter, No. 2015-006121,2015 WL 5144184 (P.T.A.B. [read post]
