Search for: "Matter of JA" Results 101 - 120 of 209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2019, 2:56 am by Florian Mueller
Nothwithstanding her consent, on the Federal Government's behalf, to the Council decision, Federal Minister of Justice [Katarina] Barley described the provision as a "wrong path" and recommended to the European Parliament the adoption of the reform bill without this controversial element (https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/heute/uploadfilter-falscher-weg-barley-bedauert-ja-zu-reform-100.html). [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 2:32 pm by Sai Vinod
 Nonetheless, the Controller refused registration for lack of inventive step and that the subject matter is ineligible in terms of Sections 3(d) and 3(j). [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 7:33 am
Take a moment and thank every judge, every JA, every court officer, every police officer when you see them. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 5:01 pm by INFORRM
On appeal, Bergin CJ in Eq (Allsop ACJ and Tobias JA agreeing) held the trial judge had erred in failing to find that the publication had occurred on an occasion giving rise to qualified privilege. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 11:55 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Abhari invented thesubject matter of the ’804 patent before the June 13, 2008filing date of Dindi. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 7:00 am by Rueben Dass
In May 2020, Ahlu-Sunnah wal Ja’maa (ASWJ), an Islamic State affiliate in Mozambique, used drones to identify targets in the Mocimboa de Praia attacks. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 9:42 am by Howard Knopf
And the result treats foreigners no worse in this respect than owners of American copyright.If this seems like déja vu all over again, it is - because there was an important similar ruling in the YouTube litigaiton by another SDNY judge, Louis Stanton, last year which I blogged about here.But it highlights an area in which US law is MUCH weaker than Canadian law. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 7:41 am by Thorsten Bausch
In the Board’s view, a referral of the question of the right venue of the oral proceedings (Referral Question 3) to the Enlarged Board of Appeal appears necessary according to Article 112 (1)a) EPC, since the question is of fundamental importance for a large number of appeal proceedings, answering it serves to ensure a uniform application of the law, and the Board considers that a decision on this matter is necessary. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:12 am by Rosalind English
While Article 6 guarantees a right to a fair trial, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence, which is primarily a matter for regulation under national law. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 11:58 am
The capital cities, or any cities for that matter, are not displayed for Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 1:53 pm by William Innes
The facts that gave rise to the assessments under appeal are summarized by Sharlow JA as follows: [30] On October 4, 1996, Peter Sommerer sold to the Sommerer Private Foundation 1,770,000 shares of Vienna Systems Corporation (the “Vienna shares”) for their fair market value of $1,177,050 (66.5¢ per share). [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
Similarly, referring to the New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal, Justice Peter McClellan and Christopher Beshara claim that ‘[i]n spite of the distasteful subject matter with which it sometimes deals, the court can occasionally be the source of humour’. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In the matter of an application by Siobhan McLaughlin for Judicial Review (NI), heard 30 Apr 2018. [read post]