Search for: "Matter of McCoy v McCoy"
Results 101 - 120
of 193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2018, 4:28 am
” In an op-ed for The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Tim Lewis weighs in on McCoy v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 5:30 pm
ShareWednesday’s argument in Wilkins v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
McCoy (Pa. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 6:13 am
Subject matter? [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 3:03 am
Here, in opposition to the plaintiff's prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the Meighan defendants failed to demonstrate the existence of any triable issues of fact with respect to their liability for legal malpractice (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324; Northrop v Thorsen, 46 AD3d 780, 784; Jampolskaya v Victor Gomelsky, P.C., 36 AD3d 761, 762). [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:27 am
Gilbert 8 NY3d 933 934 (2007); McCoy v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 3:34 am
The defendants, as the movants, failed to submit evidence sufficient to establish their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320). [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 1:44 pm
” Frye v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 4:13 pm
McCoy managed to annoy the court in under 20 seconds ??? [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 3:33 am
McCoy Rests., Inc., 708 F.2d 582, 585 (5th Cir.1983) [internal quotations omitted]. [read post]
25 May 2022, 10:48 am
In the Eastern District of Virginia, the leading case on prepetition discharge waiver clauses is Estate of McCoy v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 2:28 am
The doctrine tolls the limitations period "where there is a mutual understanding of the need for further representation on the specific subject matter underlying the malpractice claim" (McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 306), and " where the continuing representation pertains specifically to [*2][that] matter' " (International Electron Devices [USA] LLC v Menter, Rudin & Trivelpiece, P.C., 71 AD3d 1512, 1513, quoting Shumsky… [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am
In McCoy v. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 5:26 pm
Smith v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 9:41 am
” See, e.g., McCoy v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:40 am
More specifically, the continuous representation doctrine “applies only where there is ‘a mutual understanding of the need for further representation on the specific subject matter underlying the malpractice claim’ ” (Rodeo Family Enters., LLC v Matte, 99 AD3d at 784, quoting McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 306 [2002]). [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 3:30 am
In order to recover damages in a legal malpractice action, a plaintiff must establish "that the attorney 'failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession' and that the attorney's breach of this duty proximately caused plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages" (Rudolf v Shayne, [*3]Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007], quoting McCoy v Feinman,… [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 5:09 am
Much as this may make advocates sad, Lave’s premise, based on Chancellor Carol McCoy’s decision in Mock v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 4:40 am
. regardless of when the operative facts are discovered by the plaintiff” (Farage v Ehrenberg, 124 AD3d at 164 [citations omitted]; see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301 [2002]; Quinn v McCabe, Collins, McGeough & Fowler, LLP, 138 AD3d at 1086). [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 3:15 am
“This doctrine applies where there is continuing trust and confidence in the relationship between the parties and the attorney’s continuing representation pertains to the specific matter in which the attorney committed the [*3]alleged malpractice, not merely the continuity of a general professional relationship” (Deep v Boies, 53 AD3d 948, 950 [2008] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d at… [read post]
