Search for: "Matter of McCoy v McCoy"
Results 101 - 120
of 193
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2015, 6:25 am
The Supreme Court in McCutcheon v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:49 am
After Frank Russell McCoy was convicted, in a bench trial, of “one count of Transportation of Obscene Matters in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 6:22 am
The decision in Perez v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 1:44 pm
” Frye v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:35 am
United States and last Term’s Bond v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
We have defined the term “exclusively” as used in this context “to connote ‘principal’ or ‘primary,’ such that purposes and uses merely ‘auxiliary or incidental to the main and exempt purpose’ and use will not defeat the exemption’” (Matter of Yeshivath Shearith Hapletah v Assessor of Town of Fallsburg, 79 NY2d 244, 249 [1992], quoting Matter of Association of Bar of City of N.Y. v Lewisohn, 34 NY2d… [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 4:25 am
In In the Matter of Maetreum of Cybele, Magna Mater, Inc., v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 6:46 am
That's what this case is about.The case is United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
Yesterday, the New York Court of Appeals-- the state's highest court-- heard oral arguments in Matter of Maetreum of Cybele, Magna Mater, Inc. v McCoy. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:51 am
Aaron McCoy v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 4:27 am
This post discussed Sawaf v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 9:46 am
Although Alice Corp. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 9:10 am
This issue first came to the country’s attention when in a non-Maryland case McCoy v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 6:03 am
Facebook posts can be considered matters of public concern; however, the Court does not believe Plaintiffs Carter and McCoy have alleged sufficient speech to garner First Amendment protection. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:32 am
McGaha v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:56 am
Further, a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1) may be granted "only where the documentary evidence utterly refutes plaintiff's factual allegations, conclusively establishing a defense as a matter of law" (Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 10:01 am
Facebook posts can be considered matters of public concern; however, the Court does not believe Plaintiffs Carter and McCoy have alleged sufficient speech to garner First Amendment protection. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:03 am
Facebook posts can be considered matters of public concern; however, the Court does not believe Plaintiffs Carter and McCoy have alleged sufficient speech to garner First Amendment protection. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:07 pm
See, e.g., McCoy v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Coito v. [read post]
